Wow. I heard and saw some response from NZ government figures to the joint Labour/Green announcement of policy concerned with electricity market reform. Ministers Steven Joyce and Simon Bridges apparently couldn’t wait to slam the policy vociferously, taking the opportunity of ‘stand-ups’ in Parliament’s hallways to foam at the mouth issue a comment.
Having paid no attention to the policy announcement myself before I saw their responses, I was struck by their vehemence. They both looked rattled.
But today, I was even more surprised to read the hysterical attack politics contained in Mr Joyce’s overwrought ministerial media release, issued through beehive.govt.nz.
Read it (full text below) and ask yourself: Who is it that has really ‘lost the plot’ (emphasis added):
Opposition loses the plot on economy
Labour and the Greens have jumped the shark with a half-baked Soviet Union-style nationalisation “plan” for electricity in New Zealand, Economic Development Minister Steven Joyce says.
“This is truly wacky and desperate stuff obviously made up in the last minute in the Koru Lounge between comrades Norman and Shearer,” Mr Joyce says.
“Their crazy idea to have both a single national purchaser of electricity and to exempt Government-owned companies from both company tax and dividends would effectively demolish private investment in the electricity industry overnight. It would also raise real questions as to why any individual or company would want to invest in businesses in New Zealand.
“Even the idea of it is economic vandalism of the highest order, with the timing designed to try and disrupt the mixed-ownership company floats. What we are seeing here is a desperate Opposition that is prepared to sacrifice economic development in New Zealand on the altar of political opportunism.
“The sad truth is that Labour has no idea how to operate a competitive market that keeps downward pressure on prices. Labour made a number of reforms to the electricity market in the early 2000s and the result was power prices rising 72 per cent over nine years.
“This Government’s reforms have halved price increases while maintaining investment in generation and transmission. Labour’s suggestion today is no more than a belated apology for their mismanagement, with a back-to-the-70s solution that would only make things worse.
“You seriously have to question the quality of economic advice the Labour Party is getting. They really need to get a lot more serious if they are ever to be considered fit to manage the New Zealand economy.”
That’s some serious spin, Mr Joyce — but there might just be a little too much helium in that balloon. Perhaps Mr Joyce is a frustrated blogger? Or simply spending too much time in the echo chamber?
For reference, here is Mr Joyce’s official biography, detailing his own economic policy experience and other expertise:
After completing a zoology degree at Massey University, Steven started his first radio station, Energy FM, in his home town of New Plymouth, at age 21. Along with two business partners, he built up The RadioWorks both organically and by acquisition over 17 years until, as a listed public company, it consisted of 22 local radio stations and four national radio networks with 650 staff in twenty branches around New Zealand. Along the way he launched nationwide music stations The Edge, and Solid Gold FM, and developed The Rock network.
In 2000/2001 RadioWorks was purchased by Canadian company Canwest. Steven retired as Managing Director in April 2001 on his 38th birthday.
He chaired the National Party’s three person Campaign Review after the 2002 election, and then its major Strategic Review which led to a full reorganisation of the Party in April 2003. He then took on the role of being the Party’s first General Manager, and led it through to the 2005 election. He managed the 2005 election campaign for the Party.
In August 2006, Steven was appointed Chief Executive of NZAX-listed Jasons Travel Media Limited, a tourism marketing company based in Auckland, with interests in New Zealand, Australia and the South Pacific. He continued in that role for two years before leaving in order to enter politics. He has also been a director and Chairman of Taranaki-based hospital bed manufacturing and export company Howard Wright Limited, and a consultant to National Leader John Key.
Steven chaired the National Party’s successful 2008 national election campaign and was successfully elected as a list MP at the same election. Subsequently he has been appointed as a Minister in the new Cabinet.
Steven spends his spare time developing his 7 acre lifestyle property at Albany, north of Auckland, where he lives with his family, Gemma the Retrodoodle, two cattle, and assorted ducks, geese and wild rabbits.
Good to see he has a sense of humour.
– P
And for such a distinguished career, has yet to distinguish between exempt and forgo.
distinguished career … pffffft hack hack cough splutter …
More like looked after his mates in broadcasting and kissed JK’s ass so much he cant fail to be and remain a “minister”
He’s the type of guy i always hated to sit next to at conferences … grovelling and forelock tugging … the “sheriff of rottingham…” only now he’s applying the ‘jack-off” hammer of his attention to getting the chastity belt off the remainder of what made Kiwi’s great and their societal structure so appealing.
Raped by an ugly fat bureaucrat … “the joyce effect”
Jeez, that’s ugly, hateful language! Yuk.
I don’t see Steven Joyce in those terms at all.
He does have expertise, and he’s run some good campaigns. Mind you, fresh-faced John Key must have felt like a gift from heaven for the National Party campaign manager. Such a contrast to Ms Clark.
Reflecting on Mr Joyce’s extraordinary vitriol (above), I think it was a misnomer to issue that rant in the name of the ‘Minister of Economic Development’ — it would have been far more accurately labelled:
ABC — Always Be Campaigning
Before you go all funny with yourself … watch “robin hood men in tights” and see the scene where the sheriff of rottingham uses a jackhammer to try to get the chastity belt off maid marian so he can have his way with her.
Its all imagery – metaphor … gods big P use your imagination.
You drive a BMW … so you have to have an over active imagination and rich fantasy life to begin with … apply it to my imagery … and all will become clear to you grasshopper.
And do remember my friend … people like joyce look different to others … he looks to be a fat bureaucrat elevated many levels above his actual ability.
Witness Novopay.
[snip]
Jeez, I don’t like it when people get personally abusive or make potentially defamatory statements about others on my blog. (Hence the snip.)
Knock it off, please. – P
Cant remember what you snipped .. personally abusive – what … defamatory … what
Let me know …
personally … i still dont see what could be termed abusive … or defamatory …
You should read some of the stuff you personally write??
aah now i remember … sorry for the momentary lapse.
This yet confirms my Shill theory. National announce a policy and where’s your shock when Labour use Hyperbole and slam tactics.
There is none.
By the way I agree, National’s resulting comments are over the top and very aggressive.
Of course it does. We’ve discussed the problem of paradigms and confirmation bias before, you and I.
Please consider re-reading this post: ‘Negative campaigning’
http://www.thepaepae.com/negative-campaigning/24334/
and our discussion in the comment stream, which includes this:
You’ve advanced the argument that you see me as somehow the same as the propagandists I mention in that post (David Farrar and Cameron Slater).
I disagree, as I have said, but naturally you’re entitled to your point of view.
Thank you for acknowledging you too perceived Mr Joyce’s overreaction.
– P
I am well aware of humans pattern recognition where people confirm their own theory by Cherry picking there way through detail.
I don’t think you are spewing Propaganda unless being completely compromised = propaganda I don’t think so.
Sorry Peter I am far from applying these filters to my views.
I think this is an excuse you are applying to justify your lack of balance.
I have asked this many times before (still waiting)
Change my view give me 5 examples of any Positive references you have made to the “right” or Negative references to the “left”
Its not that difficult Peter. I know you love backing your views up with Link fodder.
Craig, two things:
1) I’m not your monkey. I (pointlessly, it seems) gave you examples when you asked for them in June 2012. That very post comment I quoted above contains the ‘link fodder’ you crave.
http://www.thepaepae.com/negative-campaigning/24334/comment-page-1/#comment-16136
2) You’ve now reached the status of the unreasonable, repetitive drunk person whom one moves away from — and avoids — at a party or social event.
Buh-bye.
Labour have for once .. done the right thing by announcing what they have.
All those greedy bastards who entered the “free” market so deliciously now may (may) have to live with the other side of that “free” market … its free and open to influence (unless John Key and Joycey babe and their cronies decide to change the law to make it different … and they do – oh they do naughty boys they are ….)
Suck it up New Zealand … for every action … there is undoubtedly an equal and opposite re- action … didnt some guy involved in physics postulate that – and its now established fact …???
The neo libs want it all their own way .. they are like George Bush Jr … and cheney and the rest … they think they can mould history and public opinion to suit their own purposes. Making reality as they go along … as it were …
Even the Trades people (real working people) are starting to question these dolts complete lack of humanity and commonsense toward those who form the engine of the economy …
Trouble with people who make illegal acts legal by retrospective law making … is that they can do it with anything at all … 6 million jews cant be wrong … nor can over 1 million armenians … and on it goes.
Whats illegal today … can be made illegal tomorrow … and vice versa.
I remember an old boss of mine .. prize prick … he said …. “todays policy isnt tomorrows policy and tomorrows policy may well not ever happen etc etc etc ….” in other words … “try me – and see how i can change the landscape to be lethal to you …” or words to that effect.
To quote Lethal Weapon … “Yippee ki yay … mutha f****
Pretty sure that’s from Die Hard … isn’t it?
On your more substantive point, I had friends who were involved in the abortive/aborted fledgling opening up (to private enterprise) of ACC and workplace insurance.
Labour in opposition warned that if/when they got into government again they would dismantle that lolly scramble, and were true to their word in that instance.
Some of my friends did well, but the insurance companies that bought their business I think booked a loss on that gamble.
It seems to me that what we’re seeing with this electricity reform announcement isn’t the hyped ‘Stalinist’ or ‘Albanian’ economic policy (an epithet that in NZ will always be linked to Robt. Muldoon) but a declaration to wind back the tortured and under-performing Max Bradford power reforms which have seen fat cat technocrats engorge themselves on power company boards.
I’m old enough to remember Wellington City Council’s MED – Municipal Electricity Department and going with my mum to pay the power bill in Cuba Street.
What’s wrong with community ownership, Mr Joyce? Didn’t it serve us well as a society?
– P
I love your response … and yes it was die hard … i dont like the movies but an avid fan and close family member makes me watch them …. and i suffer accordingly.
Thanks mate … you arent a bad old bugger at all …
Matt McCarten put it this way:
An energy plan to hit profiteers
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10878737
Not a bad argument.
[…] sabotage’ in response to the Labour-Greens joint electricity policy statement (see: Steven Joyce’s hyperbolic response to an Opposition policy announcement) one can’t help but think the one-seat majority National-led coalition government is getting […]