Oh Craig, where are you when I need you?

Wow!

Ralph Loura, the CIO of Clorox recently revealed the uptake when employees were given their choice of (smart)phone.

Loura so far has replaced 6,000 desktop and tower computers with lightweight HP laptops, and got rid of company-issued Blackberries while letting workers choose between an iPhone or Android or Window Phone 7-powered smartphone. The company has issued 2,000 smartphones, 92% of which are iPhones. About 6% of the smartphones chosen were Android-based while 2% were Windows Phone 7 devices.
“We live in public cloud for mail and messaging. I don’t have to worry about security because I don’t sync data to the iPhones. It remains in the cloud,” he said.

by Lucas Mearian, reporting for ComputerWorld (via John Gruber Daring Fireball)

92%? Calling all fanboys.

I *DO* appreciate a bit of personality

Here’s the NZ Listener’s 404 error page, which I struck this afternoon — quirky. I like it.

"Don't despair!" Oooh, a bit of character. Cool. (NZListener.co.nz)

 

More examples of quirkiness like this in the ‘Quirkiness’ album at thePaepae’s Facebook page

Click to visit the 'Quirkiness' album at ThePaepae on Facebook.

Big plans

The twisted tale of ‘Wellington sex trade entrepreneurs Michael and John Chow’ who want to locate a brothel across the road from Auckland’s landmark Sky Tower (!!) takes another turn.

BIG plans for Auckland. No thanks, boys. (pic stuff.co.nz)

Developers Michael and John Chow are planning to build a 10-storey super-brothel on the prime inner-city site once occupied by the historic Palace Hotel.
The “entertainment and hospitality centre” will have underground parking, a restaurant and bars and a rooftop swimming pool, as well as a “gentlemen’s club”.
Following a deal with the publishers of Penthouse Magazine, two floors of the building will be occupied by a Penthouse Club – where adult performances by models will “bring the magazine to life”.
The Chow Group have secured the Australasian rights to operate Penthouse Clubs, and the new Auckland club would be the first in the Asia-Pacific region.
However, Auckland Council spokesman Glyn Walters said no consent applications had been received for the new building’s construction.
A $200,000 bill the council sent to the Chows for the demolition of the Palace Hotel, located opposite SkyCity Casino, remains unpaid.

Read this article at the NZ Herald and this for some of the background on the buy-a-historic-building-then-renovate-it-so-incompetently-that-the-Council-orders-its-demolition-for safety-and-bills-you-$200,000-for-doing-so-then-you-announce-bigger-better-plans-that-will-need-Council-consent saga.

A Wellington perspective from the Dominion Post includes this gem: Continue reading →

Thoughts about authenticity – Sean Wood and Steve Goodey enterprises

It strikes me as ironic that the banner ads on PropertyTalk (the site I celebrated and linked to yesterday) now appear to feature ex-Richmastery property spruikers Sean Wood and Steve Goodey in their latest incarnation. Er, yuck.

Surprise! Sean Wood — still advertising on a site he said the world would be a better place without.

These two wide boys, graduates of (spat out of?) the Phil Jones charm school, have apparently divorced their latest former loyal confederates (who’ve fallen on hard times, tsk) and partnered up (cue song: Endless Love) to bring their brand of self-aggrandised spruiking to a wider public. How long will this marriage last, I wonder?

I’ve discussed these two smooth-ish operators and their established track records mixing ‘education/mentoring’ with real estate sales (in Steve Goodey’s case, even collecting a finder’s fee as a Richmastery franchisee for ‘finding’ for Richmastery ‘students’ apartments to buy in his own development!) I remember (see my post I think I would die) when Steve was so fulsomely praised by his then-partner in NZ Property Guru’s [sic] Dean Letfus in these terms:

In a pool of sharks I found Steve to be the “real deal”

Nice testimonial. But now Steve’s left Dean, apparently, and moved on to play in another pool — with Sean Wood.

Sean Wood’s track record is just as inspiring (not quite the word I was looking for). Continue reading →

A nice fresh look for PropertyTalk

My pals at PropertyTalk have just released their upgraded new look — I like it!
Fresh, clean, friendly. Good on them.

The new-look PropertyTalk forum (Safari with AdBlock)

Even with the money-making ads* showing, it’s good: Continue reading →

Great headline: Do Narcissists Know They Are Narcissists?

{snort!} Of course they do!
Read all about it from Scott Barry Kaufman at Huffington Post.
Quite funny.

Reliable sources. And not-so-reliable

Pic by Peter Aranyi

After my comments this week about the need usefulness for ‘new media’ operators to have or develop a ‘traditional’ media sensibility, I pulled out my copy of Salisbury’s Without Fear or Favor and reacquainted myself with this great book about the NY Times. It’s like everything: Where you put your focus is where you produce your results.

This passage below, about the goings-on around news coverage of the Watergate break-in and the subsequent scandal which eventually brought down Richard Nixon, exposing him and his henchmen as filthy liars, touches on a principle …

Of all the stories put together by the young reporters [The Washington Post’s Woodward and Bernstein] this was the only one to misfire seriously and it misfired on a technicality, not on its essential truth.
But Frankel had touched a critical point. Times’ style and Times’ tradition did create difficulties. It is in the nature of investigative reporting that the reporter often learns more than he is able to attribute to quotable sources. People tell him things that they do not wish traced back. The reporter can put two and two together but he cannot spell out the arithmetic in his story. Times editors and copyreaders worried about such stories, sometimes rejected them, often held them up for rechecking and rewriting. (The same thing, of course, happened at the Post.)
Then there was a question of psychology. One editor who worked at that time in both Washington and New York was convinced that “nobody really thought it was story — just a cheap low-level crime of some kind. There was no perception in either Washington or New York of what it added up to.”

I don’t mean to come on all coy and mysterious, but there are things that I am told, and documents I am sent that enable me to ‘know’ stuff that I can’t elaborate on here. For good reasons. (Some of my coverage of odious spruikers and their confederates, for instance.) It’s the same with every journalist. That’s why sometimes you’ll read a story that seems disrespectful or harsh in ‘tone’ but doesn’t necessarily spell out all the facts to justify such treatment. (The ‘arithmetic’, in Salisbury’s parlance.)
Continue reading →

Just because it is brilliant …

Lily Allen - a 'negative' twitterer, apparently. According to research funded by a beer company. Oh, right. (pic: Telegraph.co.uk - click)

I was browsing an old discussion thread at PropertyTalk Internet Marketing Consultants – suddenly there are so many…. to check when I first expressed, let’s call it ‘skepticism’ about Shaun Stenning/Geekversity (Answer: June 2009) … since I mentioned that here when discussing how his ex-business partners are NOW blowing the whistle on him.

It was a long and very interesting discussion thread (ahem) if I say so myself (48 posts. Who, me?) … And it’s still on display.

Anyway, poster HermanZ shared a passage of text, which I enjoyed at the time and still love…

It is written thus. . .
Good Book of BillyG 2.0 — Chap 4: The Siliconites


v12 And in the millenium after the big tribal wars there will grow a tree whose branches will spread to all the homes of all the people in all the lands. The people will talk on this Babel tree and learn to understand each other, some will use the tree to overthrow oppressive governments, others to warn of coming armageddon. Continue reading →

Shaun Stenning schadenfreude

Graphic by Peter Aranyi - definition from New Oxford American Dictionary

from New Oxford American Dictionary (graphic by Peter Aranyi)

Despite what some may suspect, I’ve never been big on schadenfreude and, as noted, I despise grave-dancing.

So … I feel some concern for the collateral damage inflicted as it seems pretty clear the wheels are falling off the Shaun Stenning wagon train. In the last few days several of his former business partners, associates and [allegedly] unpaid contractors — as well as numerous buyers of his ‘products’ have come out (on a Facebook anti-Fan page) — openly declaiming the silver-tongued spruiker in damning terms …

Ian Naylor:
The guy [Shaun Stenning] is an arsehole and a pathological liar, and I’m ashamed to have been in business with him. He rips off friends, customers and partners alike, no one is safe.

Vince Tan:
This is a public notice of my disassociation with Shaun Stenning and his company. Although we are not business partner, but I’ve been helping him to do some co-presenting in events and help out in some products. Truth is I’ve been dedicating a lot of my time and money over last 9 months believing that it would be for a higher purpose but ended up being in a worse situation than before knowing Shaun. I trusted Shaun and have never chase him for payment and ended up never getting paid from any events, seminar or products that I was involved with him. I am responsible for my own misjudgment and although I do not like to make such public statement but this has finally finally hit the limit of my patience. Alex Leow was right, I really don’t like to rant out these things, but enough is enough.

Maggie Vickers:
Couldn’t agree more about the liar statement – he [Shaun Stenning] certainly has made statements to me that have been blatant lies!! Very pleased I’m not working with the guy any more. … About time someone started going public about this guy. He owes me for 3 months work. I signed a contract with him and a company that ASIC doesn’t seem to have any record of… interesting!

Unlike these former associates, I’ve never met Shaun Stenning, let alone worked with him. So I haven’t had the um, opportunity to be dazzled by his charm. I made my judgements purely on the marketing material he sprayed around the web (and the fulsome and breathless endorsements from spruikers Dean Letfus and Steve pool-of-sharks [?] Goodey — a dead giveaway from my POV) and his hilarious semi-literate bush lawyer threats more than a year ago … which I considered was ‘about time someone started going public about this guy’.* (If not earlier, but I hadn’t heard of him.)

I’m not a lawyer, but it seems to me each of the ‘anti-testimonials’ above is a genuine comment or honest opinion based on personal experience.

Update: * I hope this doesn’t make me sound like a dork. I read this comment by Jason Jones (Salty Droid) who said about ‘personal development’ spruiker James Arthur Ray (on trial for manslaughter in Arizona as I write this) …

… But whatever :: I wish I would have gone to the Harmonic Wealth Weekend held in Chicago July of 2009 and hit James Ray over the head with a chair … but I didn’t. I wish I had started writing about James Ray a year earlier … but I hadn’t. These horrors not my fault either. Only one person could have prevented these deaths … and he didn’t.

… and I know how he feels.

– P

Taking criticism hard

Criticism - graphic by Peter Aranyi

A while ago, in follow up comments to a post A tale of woe … or fevered imagination?, I quoted Lemony Snickett about how reading bad news is the worst way to get it.

Here’s a similar thought from The Guardian‘s Jean Hannah Edelstein about why bad reviews rankle writers far more that good reviews encourage them…

Bad reviews mean far more to writers than good ones. It’s not the least bit counterintuitive: good ones confirm the belief that we’re gifted, which is what makes us put our writing out there in the first place. Good criticism prompts a fleeting moment of pleasure, but only briefly satiates the longing for approbation: nearly as soon as someone says something nice, we’re looking for someone else who will say something nice and then after we hear from them, we start busily coming up with reasons why we should really find someone better qualified and more astute to say something nicer.

In contrast, bad reviews confirm our darkest fears: that we are rubbish at writing. I have a vague recollection that some people said some nice things about my book when it was first published two years ago, but I couldn’t tell you what they were (I hear it was big in Slovenia). But I will forever be able to quote verbatim the words of the critic who concluded a damning review with the remark that I write like I am “rushing to finish an undergraduate essay”. The urge to seize my laptop and send a stinging riposte “… and I think you should know that I rushed to finish all of my undergraduate essays and I have a very good degree!” was intense.

From an article Hell hath no fury like an author scorned prompted by a wounded author (and now internet sensation) Jacqueline Howett’s extended bite-back at a poor review of her book… which culminated in the author telling other commenters (the world?) to F*** Off!

Pure class.

A note later in The Guardian piece contains this nugget:

…people who defensively respond to negative reactions to their work always look like fools.

… which is kind of true.

How much more so people who go fly into a foaming rage and threaten their critics and the media wherein the ‘negative’ comments are contained.

How one rolls with the punches, now that’s character revealing.

Secret? Er…

Does anyone else have a bad feeling about this? It reminds me of ‘Joe Wilson’s War’ in Afghanistan, Ronald (‘I don’t recall’) Reagan/Oliver North’s Iran-Contra deal … and, WikiLeaks or not, how is THIS supposed to stay ‘secret’? Huh?

Huffington Post headline (click for story)

Tread softly because you tread on my dreams

image source: devianart.com (click)

from Aedh Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven
by William Butler Yeats

Had I the heavens’ embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.

Timeless.

– P

Overcome the past by FACING it

20110329-074550.jpg
This article (below) from The Guardian‘s ‘Comment is free’ site reminded me of the wonderful, uplifting movie The Lives of Others which featured the late Ulrich Mühe in the role of a world-worn East German secret policeman whose job it was to bug a playwright’s apartment and report on the goings on. I won’t spoil the plot for you in case you’ve yet to see the movie but it’s surprising and heartwarming. I recommend it.

Sparked by the recent overthrow of dictatorial leadership in several Arab countries, writer Timothy Garton Ash makes a cogent case for the ‘truth and reconciliation commission’ or ‘overcome the past by fully examining it’ approach to dealing with past crimes against humanity … paying tribute to Germany’s hard-won expertise … as opposed to the ‘Pact of forgetting‘ that was for so long the Spanish response to their terrible Civil War and Fascist General Franco period … but even that shell-shocked stoicism is crumbling, thank god.

I found his ideas and his writing gripping from his opening paragraph:

Like it or not, Germany still provides the global benchmark for political evil. Hitler is the devil of a secularised Europe. Nazism and the Holocaust are comparisons people reach for everywhere.

Godwin’s Law, named after the American free speech lawyer Mike Godwin, famously states that “as an online discussion continues, the probability of a reference or comparison to Hitler or to Nazis approaches 1”

That is something today’s Germans have to live with. But there is a brighter side to this coin. For out of the experience of dealing with two dictatorships – one fascist, one communist – contemporary Germany offers the gold standard for dealing with a difficult past.

Read on at guardian.co.uk

Personally, I think the approach Timothy Garton Ash spells out for nations also works for businesses and (gasp) families. Crimes and grubby little secrets disempower us …

‘Sunlight is the best disinfectant’ the saying goes.

If we can bear it, huh?
– P

Honest opinion

A brief extract from Bevan Marten’s thesis ‘A FAIRLY GENUINE COMMENT ON HONEST OPINION IN NEW ZEALAND’ … (Victoria University) [PDF 400k]

III UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES
Common to all such jurisdictions is the major tension in the law of defamation between freedom of expression and the individual’s right to reputation. The defence of honest opinion holds a key position within this tension, and is based on a set of principles that have remained more or less intact throughout both its common law development and later statutory enactments. The key concept of the defence, which protects statements of opinion as opposed to fact, is not difficult to grasp. It is essentially that people should be able to express their own opinions on the facts before them, even when those opinions are critical of others.

Whose Honest Opinion and Why?

As a result, honest opinion is aimed at a broad range of defendants, and is certainly not limited to those expressing reasonable or orthodox views. The defence enshrines “the right of the crank to say what he likes”, and is open to commentators with exaggerated, obstinate or prejudiced opinions.

In practice the defence is especially useful to media defendants, journalists and others who frequently evaluate and comment on the actions of others. However, with the rapid growth of the internet and other readily accessible means of mass­communication, the likelihood is that a growing number of people from all walks of life will be publishing opinions and relying on the defence. Continue reading →

Some thoughts about new media values

Former CNN anchor Aaron Brown had some harsh words for his successor, Anderson Cooper, in an interview with TVNewser. … Referring to Cooper’s famous segment, he said, “I know the difference between journalism and a slogan. ‘Keeping them honest’ is a slogan.” — Huffington Post

Now that’s pretty harsh, as the nameless writer at Huffington Post acknowledged in the intro. But, at least Brown had ‘been there, done that’ — one could say he has the right to criticise.

Almost exactly year ago I briefly shared some thoughts about the need for the journalistic value of courage in ‘new media’.

Dogged and fearless — what journalism should be — and new media? (click to read the original post)

Recent discussions here on thePaepae.com have made me consider it again. We discussed how the PropertyTalk discussion forum introduced new moderation policies and substantial censorship “to avoid litigation”.

Now, while I want to be sensitive to my friends at PropertyTalk, and certainly not ‘bash’ them, it does lead into a conversation I would like to have …

Can I start by repeating this from earlier:

‘Despite my occasional disappointments with some of my friends at PropertyTalk’s actions and decisions (not them. I like them) it’s their baby — their sandpit. They can and should run it as they see fit. That’s fair.’

And add: Being a public forum, declaring itself ‘free and independent’ no less, and operating under a charter of published ‘rules’ about participation in the forum, I think it’s also fair for others to review PropertyTalk’s performance in that regard. (Criticising it as a friend, as I hope I do, not threatening them with ‘legal advice’ about ‘unlawful and illegal comments‘.)

I can only grasp for a conception of how it must feel to have outside predatory enemies like [names withheld] threatening to ‘crush’ the site and suppress discussion through pressure, sometimes nasty harassment and waving lawyers about. It’s a challenge.

A friend pointed out: “Online discussion forums are not protected 
by any benign legislation”

Do they need such protection?
I spoke with the proprietors of interest.co.nz about this last year, and their legal advice was that they as publishers are responsible for the comments on their website — yet look at the abusive, attacking ‘tone’ of a lot of discussion in their comment threads. Shocking.

But Bernard and David, like me, have a background in news journalism, and we’re familiar with bully-boy behaviour from ‘reluctant newsmakers’ and those people who HATE seeing their own words and actions examined in print. That said, I know they DO moderate the comments at interest.co.nz and respond to reasonable complaints but it’s a very different ‘space’ to PropertyTalk. I think they strike a quite different posture, which is what I want to talk about …

I truly don’t mean to sound patronising about this, but it seems to me that some ‘online community’ proprietors and managers — having stumbled into a ‘new media’ business, which actively seeking page-view-producing Web 2.0 ‘user-generated content’ — don’t possess a media/publishing sensibility.

Enthusiastic about the technology and ‘social media revolution’ they may be, but many evidently haven’t worked out or thought through the ‘fighting for the truth’ … ‘without fear or favour’ culture/approach that journalism teaches. In short: they’re unprepared and unqualified for the maelstrom their merely hosting a discussion can create. And, let’s face it, flame wars can erupt on the internet that leave us all breathless. There’s something about immediate and in some cases anonymous comment that unleashes the nasty in some people and bloggers who take ‘snarky’ to new depths. And then there are idiots.

In PropertyTalk’s case, their positioning statement: ‘free and independent’ (terms declaring journalistic colours) runs the risk of appearing to just be a slogan, as Aaron Brown alleged about Anderson Cooper.

Gina Hard Face Bitch (Fast Forward)

Traditionally-trained journalists are ‘apprenticed’, with luck, to craggy old buggers and hard-faced bitches (a reference to the wonderful Gina Hard Face Bitch from the comedy show Fast Forward). These more experienced chief reporters/editors/producers have learned (and teach their apprentices) to be careful with facts and NOT to be needlessly intimidated by bully boys or lying narcissists or those suffering from small man’s syndrome. Continue reading →