Lucky to get out …

A while ago I was on a mid-winter tour with one of my authors and to end the trip we held a final session in Queenstown — arguably New Zealand’s ski capital.  My events manager and I were booked to fly back to Auckland while our author and his spouse planned to take the ‘scenic route’.

Well, being winter, with snow falling during our workshop, we kept an eye on the airport. An approaching snow storm threatened to close it at any moment. We ended up catching the last flight out before they closed the airport for a few days. My author ended up on a coach plowing through the snow with cars lost in drifts left and right of him. High adventure over mountain roads…

Digging 'our' plane out of the snow ... Queenstown Airport 25 July 2011 (Pic by Peter Aranyi)

Fast forward to yesterday and a brilliant week-long family ski trip (it’s school holidays) during which we had fabulous weather conditions ended with a chains-on-4WD trip over the Crown Range (Wanaka to Queenstown) and our arrival at the airport for our flight to Auckland to see a Jetstar plane on the snow-blanketed tarmac. (Well, that’s a good sign, we said, not knowing it was a Christchurch flight  stranded from the night before.)

A departures board lit up with ‘Cancelled’ except for our flight with the encouraging ‘Delayed’ motif … after all, there was a plane there, and they could bus people to Christchurch (also in snow) but not to subtropical Auckland.

Long story short: A measly five hour delay, no drama, and we were on our way.  I think we were the only flight in or out of Queenstown yesterday.

Lucky! Again.

Genius

Chris Riddell on the phone-hacking scandal The Guardian (click)

The measure of character

Reuters columnist David Cay Johnston on his howler:

COLUMN-How I misread News Corp’s taxes: David Cay Johnston

Readers, I apologize. The premise of my debut column for Reuters, on News Corp’s taxes, was wrong, 100 percent dead wrong.

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp did not get a $4.8 billion tax refund for the past four years, as I reported. Instead, it paid that much in cash for corporate income taxes for the years 2007 through 2010 while earning pre-tax profits of $10.4 billion.

For the first time in my 45-year-old career I am writing a skinback. That is what journalists call a retraction of the premise of a piece, as in peeling back your skin and feeling the pain. I will do all I can to make sure everyone who has read or heard secondary reports based on my column also learns the facts and would appreciate the help of readers in that cause.

No excuses. But I will explain how I made such a bonehead error. …

and later

The measure of character, I say in my posts and lectures, is whether when an error is found you forthrightly and promptly correct.

Good work unpicking it.

– P

The attribution argy-bargy. Recidivist HuffPo ruffles feathers.

A teacher of mine used to say: ‘The only person who knows how far is ‘too far’ is the person who goes too far.’

One of 28 million images that pop up in Google search for 'pirate' ... (pic: Joahim Van der Graff ...via Tech Crunch)

With respect, NO, sometimes it’s blindingly obvious for others to see. Such as The Huffington Post’s relentless ‘aggregation’ — ‘Driving traffic, Darling’, says Arianna Huffington justifying the activities of the largely parasitic enterprise bearing her [ex-Husband’s] name.

In my view, expressed here before, HuffPo cynically exploits other news organizations and writers by scraping their content and relentless (laughable once you twig to it) SEO-pimping. The decline in quality has been noticeable, and fighting that by pinching MORE stuff from others and token linking is weak sauce. See also:Plagiarism as a business model.

Here’s a post by online columnist Simon Dumenco writing at AdAge who objected to heavy-handed appropriation of his content and received an ‘apology’ with news that Huffington Post had ‘suspended indefinitely’ the underling writer who did it … ignoring the oh-so-obvious fact that she was merely doing as she had been shown to do in the culture of Huffington Post.

What It’s Like to Get Used and Abused by The Huffington Post

The Blog Queen Defends Her Aggregation Practices by Saying She Drives Traffic. Oh, Really?
By: Simon Dumenco

One of the great and pressing questions of the post-blog age is: What constitutes unfair — unethical — aggregation? In the absence of a clear legal framework (the “fair use” doctrine in the U.S. is notoriously mushy), a lot of media people tend to use the “I know it when I see it” standard, echoing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s wry 1964 declaration about what constitutes hard-core porn.

Bill Keller, the outgoing editor of The New York Times, knows sketchy aggregation when he sees it. In his column in the Times Magazine in March, he famously attacked certain aggregators for “taking words written by other people, packaging them on your own Web site and harvesting revenue that might otherwise be directed to the originators of the material. In Somalia this would be called piracy.” He then added, “The queen of aggregation is, of course, Arianna Huffington.” …

Worth a read. And so is his follow-up.

Thanks for the Apology, Huffington Post. Now Please Apologize to the Writer You Suspended

An Open Letter From Our Media Guy to Peter S. Goodman
By: Simon Dumenco

Read ’em and weep.

John Gruber’s comment On attribution and credit seems a good way forward to me.

Huffington Post’s smash-and-grab performance was bad enough before the AOL purchase.

– P

Watching paint dry with Steve Lambert

I have a collection of quirky 404 pages in an album ThePaepae’s Facebook page.

Here’s a new one thanks to Marco Arment (Instapaper) retweeting Daniel Jalkut (MarsEdit) … it’s funny, dude.

Steve Lambert effortlessly slides through awkward into hilarious. Gnarly!

Do it: http://visitsteve.com/404.html

Is Bernard Hickey channeling the Cybermen?

One of the Cybermen from Dr Who

As someone who has occasionally (ahem) run foul of ‘Moderation policies’ at a discussion forum (don’t get me started) I was bemused when I noticed this interaction (below) on interest.co.nz

I don’t know or care what the anonymous/pseudonymous poster wrote. It must have been blinkin’ bad to raise the ire of the normally fairly laissez-faire Bernard Hickey, barkeep and piano player at the frontier town saloon that is interest.co.nz.

See Bernard’s serious-sounding last warning: ‘You will be deleted.’

I recall there was a legendary Dr Who villain who used that phrase …

Anonymous commenting can lead to all sorts of toxic flannel, vitriol and smears. Good on them at interest.co.nz for trying to keep it seemly and mucking out the stables.

‘Deletion’, seems pretty tough though.
See how it’s done, below the fold
Continue reading →

A little bit of understanding of Asperger

Congratulations to journalist Janet McIntyre, giving us an insight into life for someone with Asperger syndrome via her ‘A tale of two light bulbs‘ documentary.

I hope some more understanding of these people will result from such public/media exposure. (Is that too much to hope?) We discuss Asperger here on ThePaepae.com from time to time — my ‘umble effort to challenge the ignorant stereotype-based ‘bashing’.

Media commentator Russell Brown has spoken/written about this situation before, and his blog post today Angry and thrilled about Arie is worth a read.

And yet, as angry as I am about what has happened to Arie, I was also thrilled by last night’s programme. Thrilled to see a young Asperger man speak at such length on prime-time television, to be given such an opportunity to be understood and recognised for the person he is. For that, Janet McIntyre and the rest of the Sunday team, I am deeply grateful. Thank you.

To hear that the NZ Police informed the Sunday programme they are “under criminal investigation” seemed ludicrous and intimidatory last night. Such actions convey a distinct odour of cover-up to me. Here’s the NZ Herald story … Police investigate TVNZ looter story

At the end of the Sunday segment, presenter Miriama Kamo said the programme received an email from Christchurch Central Police Area Commander Inspector Derek Erasmus advising they were “under criminal investigation” in relation to the story.
Inspector Erasmus watched the Sunday story last night and confirmed the programme was being investigated.
“Police confirm that they are investigating the actions of the Sunday programme in relation to their dealings with parties in the case.

Seems crazy. Respect for the police is only diminished by refusal to consider their own actions — and over reactions(?) Time for them to put things in perspective and acknowledge ‘differences’ exist.

– P

In praise of Cameron Slater (yeah, I’m surprised too)

If you’d suggested to me a year ago that I would be writing an article in praise of ‘WhaleOil’ blogger Cameron Slater I would have laughed at you. Hard. Yet, here I am doing just that. Let me explain.

We’ve discussed these issues before: responding to criticism or negative feedback about one’s actions or statements, engaging with those with whom you disagree. I personally believe there’s a lot to be gained from both these practices, and I try to partake in them.

Hardly a clash of titans. Token right-winger Cameron Slater makes his case on Martyn Bradbury's 'Citizen A' TV show. Entertaining ... but clichéd?

Like a lot of people interested in NZ politics, I occasionally hear of Cameron Slater and read his sometimes elaborately denigrating blog posts. I mentioned him here on ThePaepae.com when he was emoting ‘outrage’ at Rodney Hide’s face plastered on a web graphic of a swastika flag (and that image being reposted on North Shore mayor Andrew Williams’ facebook page).  As many thought local government minister Rodney was actually acting in an unbecoming ‘We must be obeyed’ manner to do with the Auckland super city amalgamation, the swastika was fair comment in my opinion.

‘Disgusting, foul beyond belief! ‘ Cam thundered, gleefully (it looked to me) clutching another club with which to strike Williams, whom he clearly despised. I (gently) accused Cam of mock outrage at the time, and I know others who read Cam’s ‘wounded feelings’ on behalf of Rodney  and saw them as shallow and contrived — especially when considered alongside the sort of unrestrained invective and polemic Cam dishes out to those unlucky enough to incur his disfavour.

Anyway, I’m not a regular reader of Cam’s blog but a couple of years ago I did notice that it frequently refers (in supportive tones) to another free-speaking blog by the acerbic Cactus Kate — asianinvasion2006.blogspot.com/ — a thin pseudonym for Hong Kong-based Kiwi lawyer Cathy Odgers (Tagline: Saving the world from sanctimonious bearded men. One whisker removed at a time.)  She’s fun reading at times too, with her claims to be part of the VRWC (vast right wing conspiracy) and at times giving the appearance of positively delighting in being politically incorrect. She’s a laff.

Some of her material appears to be aimed at baiting left-wingers (the people Cam with his true blue National Party heritage calls ‘pinkos‘ — his dad is ex National Party president John Slater and involved with the National-Party-in-drag Citizens & Ratepayers Assn.) That’s low-hanging fruit in NZ, as a small c conservative country, and there’ll always be a market for it.

Incidentally Cathy/Catctus Kate’s blog is pretty-well respected in the blogosphere for being contrarian e.g. going to bat for Mark Hotchin (as a purely altrustic measure, it seems), pointing out repeatedly that he was being demonised (a ‘hate campaign’ I called it here) and that popular whipping boy Hanover Finance hadn’t cost the taxpayer a dollar in bailouts … unlike the South Canterbury Finance fiasco.  She also clearly puts the effort in to analyse financial statements and isn’t afraid to put out  a minority viewpoint. Indeed, judging by correspondence, I think she relishes it.  She also constructs a pretty good argument and never wastes time calling a spade a gardening implement.

All good fun, whether you or I agree with her on everything or not. A little while ago Cathy kinda sorta ‘came out‘ as a one-eyed ultra-loyal ACT supporter (‘unequivocally’, ‘staunchest female’ ‘even voted for Donna Awatere-Huata’) — it fitted. I may have missed an earlier declaration, but wasn’t exactly surprised. Never mind.
Continue reading →

The escape of exnzpat, Part 7

The Apothecary

“Come Exnzpat, come.”  But it wasn’t Lilith’s voice I heard.  Nor was it Becky’s.  Something or someone else was calling me…

“Did you say something?”  Becky asked.

“No, it wasn’t me.  But I did hear someone calling my name… did you hear something too?”

“Yes.  But… but I also heard someone crying…”

I looked at her, surprised.  “Crying… that’s weird.”

“Weirder than any of all of this!” she exclaimed.  Becky stopped and swept her arm back in the direction we had come.

The view… Whoa! Continue reading →

Capital Gains Tax: ‘Politics is the art of polarization’

The NZ Labour Party has (deliberately) let the cat out of the bag with its ‘soft launch’ confirmation that a Capital Gains Tax in some form will be part of its election policy for November 2011.

My pal Andrew King (NZ Property Investors Federation president) told TVNZ7 news he doesn't think a proposed Capital Gains Tax — just on investment property — is fair ... nor actually likely to be introduced.

Cue the scary music!  And the completely predictable howls of outrage (some justified) with cries of ‘unfair’, ‘inconsistent’, ‘distortionary’, ‘complicated’ and ‘this-will-only-make-the-tax-practitioners-rich’. Yada, yada, blah, blah…

Also cue the lip-smacking of Labour’s opponents on the right, whose political philosophy has kept NZ the largely unregulated (read: ‘ripe for pillage’) wild-west ‘free market’ (cough) low-decile country that we are, compared to Australia while aspiring to some sort of free market ‘puritanism’, even at our own expense.

Cue also the equally reflexive ‘thump the rich’ cock-a-doodle-dooo! from those who think (falsely, in my view) that it’s about time the country’s property investors ‘paid their share’ and that property speculators (said in the same tones as ‘scum sucking bottom feeders’) are taxed on their profits (if they make any, from that risky venture).

Keep the presses rolling!

Just what we need: MORE tax changes? Erk!

As the editor and publisher of Mark Withers’ Property Tax – A New Zealand Investor’s Guide (4th edition being prepared now) and Tony Steindle’s Property Law  – A New Zealand Investor’s Guide you might think I’d have welcomed the last few years of uncertainty and upheaval in our tax system — landmark changes to the taxation treatment of real estate investment, and wider changes affecting every taxpayer. Um, no, not really.

I actually have some sympathy for the point of view that the uncertainty now sparked by Labour’s CGT policy-in-embryo is good news for the accountants and ‘legal structure specialists’ … but for most investors it’ll just mean more time, money and energy spent on visits to those accountants and lawyers — just as some are getting their head around the demise of their Loss Attributing Qualifying Companies. It’s been a big few years and some of us are feeling a bit punch drunk.

Labour’s political opponents, and some in the media (same thing?) are already feeling galvanised by (at last!) having a simpleton’s ‘point of difference’ to hammer emphasise between the pretty much tweedledum and tweedledee two main parties. National under Key has cuddled so close to Labour for sound reasons  of electoral popularity — ‘Labour Lite’ was a nickname for the Nats making the rounds awhile — that Labour really had nowhere to go but left. Quite correct. Continue reading →

Smoke gets in your eyes, Carrick?

Tonight TV3 broadcast an Inside New Zealand documentary: Dying for a Smoke, highlighting some of the health issues and the political debate around suggested moves to increase controls on the sale of tobacco products —  and even suggestions to eliminate tobacco products from the country by 2020 … which strikes me as a pipe dream, if you’ll forgive the pun.

The documentary is available to view online for the next 15 days — surrounded by Quitline ads! — at TV3 on demand.

A few points I picked up: According to the programme, NZ Maori suffer the worst lung cancer rate in the world, a lot of them having become addicted at a young age. Tobacco, used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, is killing a lot of them.

The guy ‘fronting’ for the tobacco industry at the recent Maori Affairs Select Committee inquiry was asked, ‘Do you smoke yourself?’
His answer: ‘No, I don’t. Because it’s harmful and I don’t like it.’

Spokesman on behalf of the tobacco industry admits he doesn't smoke 'Because it's harmful and I don't like it.' That doesn't stop him seeking to protect the interests of those selling the deadly addictive toxin as a consumer item.

Another industry spokesman predicted a future for tobacco as a consumer product and trotted out the justification:

‘Tobacco is a legal product for which there is a legitimate demand.’
Q: Is it ethical?
Awkward pause (dodge the question) then: ‘Let’s not forget it’s a legal product.’ [Comment: FAIL]

I wondered what my ex Twitter follower, tobacco industry apologist and Mark Hotchin’s spin doctor Carrick Graham might be making of it. Well! I should’ve guessed. Demonstrating his (pro?am?) fixation … and busier than a one-armed paperhanger, by the look of his tweet stream during the programme (below) … live-blogging as if he was at an iPhone launch! Continue reading →

Head on a spike

20110706-023802.jpg

So Alasdair Thompson’s words, taken by so many to reveal an anachronistic misogynist attitude, have cost him his job.

Even more intriguing is this line from the NZ Herald‘s ‘breaking news’ story:

His conduct sparked an angry outcry on micro-blogging site Twitter and saw the Council of Trade Unions call for him to be fired.

Crikey. As if an ‘angry outcry on Twitter’ justifies anything …

'Twitter 'controversy = a lazy journalist's version of the already worthless 'man in the street' vox pops'... Manufactured filler.

Update: I spotted this at the library …

Fate sealed?

Murdoch Phone hacking – a visceral jolt

At the risk of being perceived as a mere echo chamber, I really recommend you read these articles. (click)

Wow, read this piece after my own heart:  Rupert Murdoch Meets His Ahab by Jack Shafer in Slate. Brilliant. First words:

If Rupert Murdoch could be slain by a mere scandal, he would have been embalmed and entombed long ago. The genocidal tyrant has successfully swept away every scandal—major and minor—he has ever faced because of his special skill at normalizing his malefactions. …

And do follow his link to 3 minutes audio of Hugh Grant on BBC radio … describing the past editors of News of the World as “the worst editors in the history of journalism—or liars.”

Seriously, read Shafer’s article.

And here’s ‘Ahab’ Nick Davies’ latest exposé about the loathsome phone hacking.

– P

On a collision course

I briefly mentioned in passing the small c ‘controversy’ generated by blogger Martyn ‘Bomber’ Bradbury loudly expressing his opinion about whether or not blogger Cactus Kate (Cathy Odgers) was suitable ACT MP candidate material.

‘Hell no’ Bradbury says (or words to that effect) because he says she’s a ‘far right hate merchant’ who has previously expressed what he says are outrageous hateful statements about the poor. Despite her ‘fierce intelligence’ she should not even be selected as a candidate, he says.

Blogger Cameron Slater, as a panel guest on Bradbury’s online TV show, echoed the dead obvious question:

What business is it of Martyn Bradbury’s who ACT chooses as its candidates? None, is the answer, but he is perfectly entitled to express an opinion. Aren’t we all?

Cathy/Kate can certainly hold her own, judging by this for instance.

A white supremacist in the woodpile?

Fast forward a few days and the same Martyn Bradbury declares as ‘breaking news2005 (six years old) emails linking a founding member (whatever that is) of the newly-formed anti-MMP lobby group and knitting circle ‘Vote for Change’ to an Australian white supremacist group. (I am resisting the temptation to indulge in Aussie jokes. Re-sist-ing.)

Again, on the basis of outrageous hateful statements he showed this Alex Fogerty character apparently wrote (at 19?) and his past membership of that political witches coven, Bradbury seeks not just to embarrass Fogerty and the Vote for Change macramé group but, in a similar fashion to his voluble campaign against the very idea of Catctus Kate’s candidacy for ACT, seeks to disenfranchise Fogerty and his ilk.

You think I’m making that up?
Look:

Some animals are more equal than others ...

“…screw white supremacists being involved in any NZ political debate!” Oh dear.

That shut them out suggestion, as I said to Bradbury on Twitter (see conversation above right) is a step too far — even accepting Alex Fogerty did espouse white supremacist views … views that most Kiwis would shun. Sorry, Bomber, that qualifies as an outrageous hateful statementContinue reading →

George Orwell nails journalism? … Maybe.

Writer George Orwell poses in this undated photo at an unknown location. Orwell was born Eric Arthur Blair in Motihari, India in 1903 and died in 1950. (AP Photo)

I had cause to think about public discourse, propaganda and Public Relations recently …

Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.
— George Orwell

Is the English press honest or dishonest? At normal times it is deeply dishonest. All the papers that matter live off their advertisements, and the advertisers exercise an indirect censorship over news. Yet I do not suppose there is one paper in England that can be straightforwardly bribed with hard cash. In the France of the Third Republic all but a very few of the newspapers could notoriously be bought over the counter like so many pounds of cheese.  — George Orwell – The Lion and the Unicorn (1941)