Louise Mensch right wing vixen part 2


I mentioned UK Tory MP Louise Mensch in July applauding her handling of a blackmail attempt. Here’s a profile from The Guardian‘s Decca Aitkenhead Louise Mensch: ‘We’re not all ogres’ which is very interesting for similar reasons, and more…

Interesting to see the full shot which The Guardian evidently cropped to emphasise the 'facelift' angle, huh? Trivialising her, in a way, if you ask me.

We were still swooning at her brio when rioting broke out across Britain and she made headlines again, calling for Facebook and Twitter to be closed down during civil unrest. Many commentators considered the suggestion merely foolish, but computer hackers issued death threats against her and her children, which she promptly posted on Twitter, along with the defiant message: “Get stuffed, losers. I don’t bully easily.” A man has since been arrested. Along the way there was also a change of name, following her wedding to Peter Mensch – manager of Metallica and the Red Hot Chili Peppers – in a ceremony kept so secret, even her own children apparently weren’t told. And now, when we meet, another “secret” emerges, which plainly isn’t going to be a secret any more.

All in all, quite a summer. But Louise Mensch is quite a woman, one of the most formidable I have met in a very long time. Confident, combative, quick on her feet and fiercely intelligent, she also has that irresistibly easy charm that comes from a really expensive education. Her conversational style bears more than a hint of the junior debating champion –”I dispute the premise of your question,” and suchlike – and so conscious is she of her audience that she addresses most of her answers into the Dictaphone on the table between us. But she delivers them in flawless paragraphs of elegantly crafted sentences, with a fluency you seldom come across. Half the time she sounds like an aristocratic Edwardian, yet she can slip into the register of a Radio 1 presenter without sounding the least bit inauthentic. Focus groups love to ask voters, “Which politician would you most like to have a drink with?” and on that test I cannot think of anyone in Westminster who would beat her.

Read the profile and see if you think she’s handling the ‘facelift?’ questions well. I think they’re close to completely irrelevant. But apparently they’re a sore point — see Tory MP ‘hits the roof’ over comparison to model

This, section, too is very good, and sort of reminds me of some of Cathy Odgers’ (Cactus Kate’s) cant, only better expressed.

As part of the selection process she was asked to write an essay entitled: Why Are You A Conservative? Her first sentence was: “Because conservatism delivers liberal ends.” On economic policy, she regards herself to the right: “But I believe you should look at your policies in terms of how they’re going to impact the poorest people first. I fundamentally believe that politics is counterintuitive. The left think they’re helping working people by providing more rights, but all that actually happens is you create poverty and despair, because jobs go to your competitors who have fewer rights for workers. So which is the compassionate policy? I believe Toryism is the compassionate policy.”

On social policy, she places herself squarely on the left. “I am a feminist, I am in favour of gay marriage and totally against the death penalty. I would leave the party if we were to bring in anything remotely resembling it. I can’t emphasise enough how opposed to it I am. It’s barbaric, and it’s a shame on the United States that they still use it. Give me an American politician who’d oppose the death penalty and I’d die in a ditch for him – even if he was a Democrat.”

I read a similar expression of that thought: “because jobs go to your competitors who have fewer rights for workers” in a John A Lee book Political Notebooks over the summer. More on that later.

– P

Blogger not news media … continued

A leaked instruction manual for a cell phone has led to this:

Judge: Blogger not a reporter, must turn over information-Chicago Tribune

A spokesman for the blog, which has a staff of writers and editors, said the case is the first time in Illinois a judge has been asked to rule whether a blogger is the same as a journalist in the law’s eyes.

Judge Michael Panter, while acknowledging that it was “a fast-evolving issue facing courts everywhere,” ruled that TechnoBuffalo isn’t a news medium and its bloggers aren’t protected under Illinois shield laws for journalists.

Elizabeth Bradshaw, an attorney for the blog, said she plans to appeal and the decision potentially “poses a threat to all news media, including bloggers.” Rettinger issued a statement saying he was “extremely disappointed.”

So, in Chicago, a blog with a staff of writers and editors (claiming one million visitors a month) and attracting leaks is not ‘news media’ … How does this square with the NZ Law Commission’s (trivially low IMO) suggested threshold for definition as ‘news media’ with attendant (cough) ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation’ …

1. has a significant proportion of their publishing activities being the generation and/or aggregation of news, information and opinion of current value
2. disseminates this information to a public audience
3. regularly publishes
4. is accountable to a code of ethics and a complaints process

Oh.

Are we heading for typical NZ Wild West-style light regulation? Is a door-wide-open approach the only way to tackle devious liars on the Internet?

Hmm.

– P

(thanks to Kashmir Hill)

See also: Bloggers v journalists and ‘YOU don’t say who or who isn’t a journalist’

When hyper-linking gets in the way

From a good article Why Christian Science Monitor stories have too many links, wrong ones by Justin Martin writing at Poynter:

A visible link in a news story is a caesura, a stoppage that forces a cognitive pause. The word “caesura” is a poetry term and, just as in poetic writing, literary pauses must be used with both caution and cause.

“Hyperlinks,” wrote Nicholas Carr in “The Shallows,” “alter our experience of media … Links don’t just point us to related or supplemental works; they propel us toward them. They encourage us to dip in and out of a series of texts rather than devote sustained attention to any one of them.” He goes on to say that links’ “value as navigational tools is inextricable from the distraction they cause.”

(Guilty, your honour. I promise to try to do better.) Worth a read, and I always like meeting a new word.

We’ve discussed my view of the value of linking to sources — to demonstrate the veracity of [contentious?] statements or claims — and I stand by that, but do I also recognize Martin’s (and Carr’s) point about causing a sometimes unintended ‘cognitive pause’. 

It’s a balance, I think. Certainly I try to link to/attribute for other sound reasons. (I’m persuaded by Cactus Kate’s occasional grizzle about the NZ Herald’s willingness to quote her but not link to her blog that they’re being dorks by doing that.) 

In general, I think relevance has to be the guiding principle. Which is, I think, the point.

How do you see it?

– P

 Image: viglink.com (click)

Lack of truthtelling devastates media, old & new

Should news reporters call out what they see as lies? Are you kidding me?

Forget (for now) the place of unwanted ‘opinion’ in ‘news’ (or somewhere near by) — there’s a bigger issue at stake in modern media … whether (or not!) to call out politicians and other newsmakers for false statements they make.

As noted elsewhere, I am troubled by political activists and proxies masquerading (or fancying themselves) as something akin to news media who promulgate exaggerations and half truths. That’s beyond the pale, in my opinion, a truth FAIL, whether they like it or not … or whether they disclaim with ‘FFS, I am not a journalist …‘ when it suits them … while schizophrenically also aspiring to ‘media’ privileges like membership of the parliamentary press gallery. Oh dear.

Telling the truth seems to me to be a requirement.

But the tragedy of modern media (all media) is a sometime reluctance or unwillingness to act as what the NY Times public editor Arthur Brisbane recently called a ”truth vigillante” (as if that’s a bad thing) — and he posed it as question(!): Should The Times Be a Truth Vigilante? My response to seeing that headline in my Twitter stream was “Should the Pope be a Catholic?” Gee, Arthur. Duh. Continue reading →

Mealy-mouthed

Heard on Radio NZ National’s World Watch this afternoon:

“There’s strong evidence to suggest the worst of the eurozone crisis could be over…”

Crikey. Ya reckon? How to say something without really saying anything or committing yourself.

Shoot me (joke) if I write something so equivocal. Please.
It’s almost as bad as hyperbolic self-promotion.

– P

Attacking Mitt Romney

click to watch video - below fold

Look at this attack ad aimed at US Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (below the fold) with NO mention of who its producers and publishers actually support. It’s just a smear of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (vomit) ilk.

We don’t have a lot of this type of political advertising in NZ … do we? Dancing Cossacks aside, when was the last party political broadcast that demonized ‘the other side’ in such a histrionic, mini-horror-movie way?

Continue reading →

A new song from Leonard Cohen

The Darkness — by Leonard Cohen from his upcoming new album Old Ideas

For me, Leonard Cohen is an example of someone who produces life-affirming inspiration from behind the cloud of a life blighted by bouts of depression. Good on him. I’ve been listening to his music all summer in my car.

More here: Leonard Cohen tags at The Paepae

– P

Liars can be truthful?

The weakest part of Piers Morgan’s attempted refutation of his former employee’s allegations that he (Morgan) must have known about phone hacking at the Daily Mirror while he was editor …

Morgan, 46, has already dismissed Hipwell’s claims as the “unsubstantiated allegations of a liar and convicted criminal.” Trinity Mirror Group lawyer Desmond Browne also has rejected Hipwell’s allegations.

NZ Herald

Although someone fitting Morgan’s description of Hipwell undoubtedly does face challenges to their credibility, it doesn’t follow that nothing they say is true, nor that their recollections of their work environment (i.e. “phone hacking was run of the mill”) are lies.

I’ve interacted with some compulsive liars in my time. It’s amazing watching them lie about things they don’t need to lie about to facilitate their con. It’s as if they just can’t help themselves — which is why it’s called ‘compulsive’ huh?

The other compulsion is denial, even faced with convincing evidence of their misdeeds some people just can’t admit it. I read about the Nuremberg trials and the blame-shifting and denial rife in that group. I was reminded of this when I saw a report that James Murdoch claimed he ‘didn’t read’ an explicit email … oh dear.

Best line was Charlie Brooker’s tweet:

Former Mirror journo says phone hacking was “bog-standard journalistic tool”.. So was Piers Morgan!!!1! LOL etc http://bbc.in/tXyxDs

– P

Just like ol’ times — NZ Herald tells us what we’re interested in

This from the NZ Herald earlier this week:


Wednesday’s article “How to get RICH — 10 steps to becoming a millionaire” (written by a freelance writer whose net worth isn’t stated) is sooo reminiscent of the boom days and the breathlessness of the pursuit of money. And we can see how that worked out.

Question: Do you think the media (a) leads or (b) reflects what we’re interested in?

I think (b).

– P

Guest post: poormastery hearts Ron Paul

Ron Paul (image politicaltramp.com)

On the subject of US politics, this is who poormastery is supporting to be the next President:

I believe that Ron Paul was the only person who voted against the so-called “Patriot Act”. Ha. Love it.

Many of his views I disagree with, but he is the best Republican candidate – by miles.

“And I see in Paul none of the resentment that burns in Gingrich or the fakeness that defines Romney or the fascistic strains in Perry’s buffoonery. He has yet to show the Obama-derangement of his peers, even though he differs with him. He has now gone through two primary elections without compromising an inch of his character or his philosophy. This kind of rigidity has its flaws, but, in the context of the Newt Romney blur, it is refreshing. He would never take $1.8 million from Freddie Mac. He would never disown Reagan, as Romney once did. He would never speak of lynching Bernanke, as Perry threatened. When he answers a question, you can see that he is genuinely listening to it and responding – rather than searching, Bachmann-like, for the one-liner to rouse the base. He is, in other words, a decent fellow, and that’s an adjective I don’t use lightly. We need more decency among Republicans.”

Ron Paul For The GOP Nomination — Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Beast

Actually, I quite liked Sullivan’s closing parting shot as well:

“I feel the same way about him on the right in 2012 as I did about Obama in 2008. Both were regarded as having zero chance of being elected. And around now, people decided: Why not? And a movement was born. He is the “Change You Can Believe In” on the right. If you are an Independent and can vote in a GOP primary, vote Paul. If you are a Republican concerned about the degeneracy of the GOP, vote Paul. If you are a citizen who wants more decency and honesty in our politics, vote Paul. If you want someone in the White House who has spent decades in Washington and never been corrupted, vote Paul.

Oh, and fuck you, Roger Ailes.”

Denouement of Dean Letfus

This has been a slow train coming down the track, and I take no pleasure in recording it.

Almost a year after the wheels fell off the Shaun Stenning-Dean Letfus-Steve Goodey hyperbole machine, reality is sinking in with attendant finger-pointing and blame shifting.

As you will see if you care to follow discussion and comments here at The Paepae about Shaun Stenning, Dean Letfus and Steve Goodey and their failed NZ Property Gurus/internet marketing enterprises, claims of distance seem hollow and implausible sophistry. Well, they do to me, personally.

These guys are spruikers and their chief skill seems to have been a talent for hyperbolic sales.

– P

Massive website letdown

GREG NINNESS Last updated 10:19 18/12/2011

The collapse of Dean Letfus’ Massive Action seminar business has left scores of investors unhappy over internet marketing schemes they bought through the company.

Letfus portrayed himself as a property investment guru and promoted his seminars and consulting services through Massive Action’s website.

Letfus also promoted an internet marketing package called Snipr, telling prospective buyers they could generate a significant cash income through the scheme.

However, the expected returns failed to eventuate for many and because Massive Action has been placed in liquidation they have no way of recovering their money.

Continue reading →

So emotionally real

I’m really impressed with the emotional honesty and fairness of this song by Gotye featuring Kiwi songstress on the rise Kimbra.

Terrific.

And what a beautifully directed and shot video!

Hitchens on Clinton

He’ll say anything. He’ll try anything. He’s a complete solipsist and completely without scruple.

Christopher Hitchens RIP

Trying to find our own truths

This, from Deborah Hill Cone’s farewell column Black-and-white thoughts on a world of grey in the NZ Herald today echoes something …

I just write because I’m trying to work out things for myself, which is shamefully indulgent. So I really should be thanking you, Dear Fabulous Readers, after all.
Thing is, we’re all just trying to find our own truths.

Yeah. I know what she means. This is how I put it in Why am I doing this? Muckraking?:

The value of writing for ourselves: Writing to work out what I think

Sometimes I don’t know what I think or feel about a topic until I have a go at expressing it.

I have been taught (and I believe today) that what we sometimes call our ‘intuition‘ is the sum total of our experiences. That includes ‘non-verbal’ knowledge or ‘I-haven’t-quite-made-the-connection’-type links between different forces and facets of a situation or an issue. People are complicated. Sometimes our conclusions can be unspoken, nascent — subterranean, buried in our consciousness.

With luck (and a protracted endeavour to ‘express a thought’) I can find my way into or through complex matters through reflection and consideration, some of that through written exploration. It can be an effort, it can take time. But as John F Kennedy said: “Too often… we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

I am one of those who do like to process things mentally. (‘That’s just how I roll.’ {snort})

I try to always be aware that we are each emotional beings (children, really, eh?) I’d be the first to admit we cannot gain access to our deeper selves, our souls, through purely mental means … but it can help.

Meditation and reflection, and discussion, thinking-out-loud, and writing one’s thoughts can uncover conclusions, decisions and truths — truths our reactive minds, unexpressed, just could not get to.

So, that’s why I do this. For the journey of discovery.

Good luck Deborah. Thanks.

– P

Paris Review: Hunter S. Thompson

As I noted, I’m reading (and thoroughly enjoying) Gonzo. So I looked up his Paris Review Interview:
Hunter S. Thompson, The Art of Journalism No. 1 – Interviewed by Douglas Brinkley, Terry McDonell

A great read.

-P