Conservatism with an open mind

Here’s a link to an excellent Andrew Sullivan article Conservatism And Extreme Inequality which discuss the challenge conservatism faces when responding to changed economic times. Part of it made sense. (Not just the part about ‘The good thing about having a blog is that I can go back and read my first impression …’)

I get a bit of stick now and then for being ‘centrist’ — not willing to full-heartedly commit (or pretend to commit) to either ‘side’ of the political spectrum but trying to see the value in both.

I’m reading Christopher Hitchens’ memoir Hitch-22 at present, and he recounts a phrase “He’s Tory but he’s got nothing to be Tory about.” It made me think of some of our own ‘political players’ who act as if politics is soccer and as if their team loyalty matters more than anything else, and for whom a ‘sledge’ or a nasty put-down of a political enemy (really, just ‘the other side’) is an achievement.

Andrew Sullivan makes the point that the partisanship obscures the political balance which, it seems to me as a ‘centrist’, is our best safeguard …

Conservatives, from Aristotle on, have always understood the central importance of the “middle way” and the “middle class” in sustaining a liberal democracy. Disraeli and Bismarck were the European pioneers of this conservatism. I think of Eisenhower in the last century as its great conservative defender in the US. Reagan was a necessary, even vital, correction, after liberal over-reach, but when that correction became dogma, and the right became fundamentalist about it, and the political fundamentalism was fused with a religious one, you saw the GOP degenerate into its Cheneyite and then Tea Party form: intellectually incoherent, angry beyond reason, and defined by cultural fear.

In an email Jon wrote discussing this subject, he expanded:

“Conservatives should be MORE worried about inequality than liberals, at least the kind of inequality we’re seeing now. It will wreck the legitimacy of the values they hold dear and discredit them for two generations (a narrative Romney is doing his formidable best to set up).”

Exactly. Romney personifies the kind of person who profited fantastically from the post-Reagan era and Ryan the small, tight brain that is still intellectually arrested in 1979. I know their abstract arguments and want to agree with them. But they are not in tune with these times – and are not responding to them. They have dogmas but no solutions. Obama, at least, is steering the ship a little further away from the rocks. That will have to do for now – it may be all anyone can do for now. And it’s what a real conservative would support.

Worth a read.

– P

‘The Nation’ on the disintegration of the ACT Party

I watched this report on TV3’s The Nation this morning.
It contains some interesting comments about the ACT Party and the toxicity of John Banks’ involvement, or, as the piece says, ACT’s narrowed focus in winning Epsom as their only hope of ‘survival’ and Banks’ ability to resemble a team player while ‘looking out for number one’. Worth watching.

It must be gut-wrenching for former ACT Party activists like the savvy Cathy Odgers to watch the decay. Or perhaps by now she’s experiencing a different ‘stage’ of grief, and practising detachment? Very Zen.

I briefly had cause this week to remember apprentice political assassin Jordan Williams and his role in Don Brash’s putsch — which aimed at revitalising ACT* but in reality mortally wounded it. I recall Cathy’s trenchant criticism of the Brash effort (and Jordan Williams in particular) over their claimed use of ‘dodgy polls’ to undercut and usurp Rodney Hide as party leader. (There’s a view the polls never existed, and the ‘projected’ gain from a Brash leadership was fiction.)

And look how well that’s worked out (see ACT: ‘Zero backing. Zilch, nil, nothing at all.’ and above). Why, almost as well as Jordan Williams’ (strictly professional) anti-MMP performance and frenzied efforts to demean Winston Peters in the lead up to the 2011 election.

Others may see it differently, but I think democracy relies on citizens having a vehicle for their political ideas and enthusiasms, whether they’re popular or not. But don’t we expect them to be honest about it?

– P

* I don’t buy the theory put about by some that the whole affair was just a vehicle for Don Brash’s ego.

I guess it’s too late for Mr Key to complain to the Advertising Standards Authority …

Sorting out some pix from the General Election campaign this afternoon, and found … remember this?:

“A vote for me helps John Key”

Oh dear.

Oh boy.

– P

A second apology (this time from Apple)

Apple’s iPhone Maps application (in iOS6) was delivered half-baked. That seems obvious.

Here’s Apple CEO Tim Cook apologising for (shock, horror) ‘the debacle’. Good on him. Will it pull the sting?

My first reaction to the shortcomings was to install a bookmark on my home screen for the web app of Google Maps (see below). It seems clear they’re working on it. I’ll be patient, too. Judging from experience, Apple will crunch this and update their (beautiful-looking, more powerful*) Maps app PDQ. That’s my point of view. But then …

– P

* “Best interface, fed by the worst data” Chris Keall at NBR called it.

Geeks at play.

An apology unlikely to pull the sting

There’s no need for me to dwell on this disgrace. There’s plenty of coverage.*


“Of course I apologize to Mr Dotcom. I apologize to New Zealanders …”
— Prime Minister John Key (MP3 file here)

Ghastly.

Sometimes being the Minister in charge of the ‘intelligence’ services is a real let-down.
I doubt that Mr Key is enjoying his work day at the moment. What a waste of Brand-Key this is.

– P

*Here’s the list from Bryce Edwards’ NZ Politics Daily round up today.

Spying on Dotcom

Kirsty Johnston and Ian Steward (Stuff): Dotcom’s lawyers question police statements
Graeme Edgeler (Public Address): Kim Dotcom: Questions and Answers
Fran O’Sullivan (Herald): Dotcom spying worry for business
Ian Steward and Kirsty Johnston (Stuff): Expert to make Dotcom spy data decision
Danyl Mclauchlin (Dim-Post): No surprises please
Jane Clifton (Stuff): Drop, cover and hold, John
Scott Yorke (Imperator Fish):No Sympathy
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A theory with the GCSB case  
Dom Post: Editorial: Spying is a betrayal of trust
Claire Trevett, Adam Bennett and Andrew Koubaridis (Herald): Police blamed for Dotcom spying scandal

 
And, you can be sure we haven’t heard the last of it.

Ye-ouch! Emmerson on Dotcom debacle

Crikey! That’s strong … Well, fair enough I guess.

In A farce upon farce reaching to the highest level — John Armstrong of the NZ Herald offers a passable imitation of an apologist’s defensive spin for the Key government, ending with this:

[Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Bill] English’s behaviour is inexplicable. But the Dotcom affair has seen farce increasingly piled on farce. You would accordingly have to favour botch-up on English’s part ahead of conspiracy.

Oh. That’s reassuring, John. (Not.)

– P

Scratch testing an iPhone5. Gulp.

Holy cow. I’ll be getting one of these phones … but I’ll treat it a little better than THIS:

I don’t expect my gear to be literally bulletproof. But wow, the internet is FULL of drop-tests-to-destruction … is there a name for that? Shiny-gadget-bashing-porn?

– P

UPDATE: From 9to5 Mac

Shocker!

 

Bewildered betrayal

Leo Traynor relates his heartbreaking [true] story about the anguish a troll on the Internet can cause, especially if they ‘reach out’ in the real world. Read it. Please.

This is why I left Twitter, why I came back and how I met a Troll. (via @ohsarahrose)


I’m aware of a case years ago where a troubled teenaged son living at home was found, on police investigation, to have repeatedly daubed ugly anti Semitic slogans on his (Jewish) parents house. His actions caused terrible mental anguish — before and after he was identified as the perpetrator.

I had cause to remember that case (from long ago) and re-imagine the sense of bewildered betrayal around it when absorbing news reports about the vandalism, arson, slogans and abusive letters directed at farmer Scott Guy and his family — by his (perfectly sane?) brother in law.

There’s something very awful and unsettling about an ‘inside job’ like this.

Leo Traynor (above) demonstrates a level of understanding, compassion and humanity that impresses me very much — a level to which I hope I could rise, (lord, don’t lead me into temptation).

To be able face your tormentor and quench a sense of righteous rage — think of the protective papa bear urges — is a big step. He did it without disgrace, without vindictiveness.

Well done to him. I don’t know if I would be so kind. But I would be just as curious about what drives such behaviour.

– P

Free hits on John Key over illegal spying

Wow, talk about a clobbering machine

Dotcom: Illegal spying revealed (NZ Herald)

Labour leader David Shearer said the alleged illegal spying amounted to a “shocking breach” of New Zealand law.
He said Mr Key needed to explain a claim he had not heard of Mr Dotcom until the day before a police raid was carried out at his Coatesville mansion.
Mr Key would have been called on to authorise monitoring carried out by the GCSB, Mr Shearer said.
“While it’s been revealed that ‘some’ bugging was done illegally, it is not credible to think that other monitoring by the agency was not signed by the Prime Minister before the raid was carried out.
“This is not about national security. This is about John Key’s own word and whether he has told the truth to New Zealanders.”

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said Mr Key had failed in his responsibility to oversee the GCSB and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service.
His actions showed a “mega disregard” to his role and his actions amounted to “dereliction of duty”, Mr Peters said.

“The taxpayers of New Zealand are about to pay a fortune to Mr Dotcom because of the Prime Minister’s cavalier disregard for his responsibilities.
“Mr Key appears not to care about the security of New Zealanders, and is instead more concerned with photo opportunities, three-way handshakes at rugby games, and prancing down fashion runways.”

Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said the actions of the GCSB should be concerning to all New Zealanders.
“A number of New Zealand agencies, including the police, have bent over backwards to assist the United States in prosecuting Mr Dotcom,” said Dr Norman.

I’m not saying what these Opposition leaders are saying is wrong, but their apparent rush to climb all over prime minister John Key and lay it all at his feet resembles kicking a man when he’s down. Or is that just politics?

What do you think?

– P
Oh, look:

Ruby Sparks. A nice story, beautifully told.

I loved this movie. It’s deft. Trust me, see it. – P

‘The problem with any ideology’ — Bill Clinton

I heard this in Bill Clinton’s interview with Jon Stewart 20 Sept 2012 talking about finding solutions for economic challenges.

‘The problem with any ideology is it gives you the answer before you look at the evidence. So you have to mould the evidence to get the answer that you’ve already decided you got to have. It doesn’t work that way …’
— Bill Clinton

True.

– P

Joy of Tech having a laff at Apple maps

via AllThingsD (click)

#PlanetKey OPEN MOCKERY continues, corroding the Teflon

Trust Steve Braunias …

Pressure? Who me? (image: 3News)

The secret diary of … Planet Key (click)

In which Braunias delivers a poke of (well-deserved?) ridicule and indignity to the Prime Minister’s ‘Planet Key’ clanger.

I wonder if Mr Key or his advisors sense yet how complete the appearance of tone-deafness was in his juxtaposing a ‘Nirvana’ of abundant golf courses (no toilets) with ‘nasty party’ policies like welfare cuts/crackdowns, school closures mergers and, of course, asset sales.

Combined with his determined ‘Keyvasive action‘ Mr Key’s failure to acknowledge that his minister John Banks’ has, er, truthfulness issues … well, do you think they make him look out of touch?

Of course, I could be reading this completely wrong, and it may be the nation continues to hold the prime minister in a warm and undying embrace of popular approval. But that’s not how it works.

Mr Key is being seen as cynical … and no longer the ‘anti-politician politician’. (Was he ever, really?)

Look at these damning comments from John Armstrong’s NZ Herald column today … Backed into a corner, so come out joking

Coalition partners Banks & Key in happier times. (pic: Mark Mitchell NZ Herald)

For now, Key is lumbered with Banks by virtue of needing his vote to secure a majority on legislation where National does not have the backing of the Maori Party.

But this is now a one-sided relationship. Banks is now permanently indebted to Key for retaining him as a minister when by any reasonable test he has failed to meet the high ethical standards expected of someone in such a position.

Act’s leverage – minute as it already was – has been heavily discounted accordingly.

Banks is now essentially an irrelevance. His only other options are to resign his ministerial warrant and go to Parliament’s backbenches, where he could choose to vote against the Government on some measures – something which would lead to even more scorn being heaped upon him.

Alternatively, he could resign from Parliament. No one would bet against that happening.

But the more immediate question is how much damage Banks’ remaining a minister is doing to Key’s reputation.

Damage to a reputation. Yes, as Claire Trevett rather memorably said:

Having withdrawn all his own credit from the ATM of credibility, Banks is now relying on Key’s. The reason Key has given Banks his pin number is that the PM’s eye is on the bigger picture, just as it was with that rather demeaning cup of tea: stability of Government.

It may well be said that Mr Key understands his words and actions are diminishing his reputation. And he may have calculated that as acceptable (what choice does he have?) for the sake of big issues … but it seems to me his clumsily-delivered, actually-not-all-that-funny-prime-minister, ‘Planet Key’ nonsense smacks of, well, a certain contempt.*

That just strikes me as a waste of Brand-Key’s political capital and further, it risks corroding the famous teflon coating.

– P

*Same with his “Maori have more positions on water than Lady Gaga has outfits” ‘joke’. Gauche.

All in a good cause, we assume?

Gawd, I loved The West Wing … this ‘star-studded’ campaign ad for Bridget Mary McCormack
uses the members of the ensemble and some of Sorkin’s visual ‘vocabulary’ (including cliché e.g. ‘walk and talk’) combined with what I’ve for so long thought of as ‘Mad About You’ whip-snappy dialogue and, mannered lecture-ettes.

That I have such affection for these characters clearly makes me a humanist lefty … I guess.

– P

thanks to @ohsarahrose …

Thanks @CateOwen, for passing on the encouragement

Talk to Old People

Talk to Old People (pic: Cate Owen)

One of the nice things about Twitter — or better put: one of the nice things about following certain people on Twitter is that they can easily share ‘fings’ they see or come across or think about … and easily pass them on to you.

This, from @CateOwen, touched me today…

Cate may not have been the ‘artist’, but sharing it in such a low-friction way, has been A Good Thing for me today.

Nice.

– P

PS Did you notice the ‘A’ and the ‘K’ ?