After the storm. You may have to go further than you thought.

After my 5 km this morning I rocked up to the beach looking forward to a swim …

Beach closed 1398

Oops. Probably the effect of the overloaded storm water system in the recent heavy rain. Either that or — as one of my fellow swimmers suggested this morning — so much dog shit on the beach it skewed the water quality testing thingy. “They look for faecal matter, you know,” she said. “Just swim out further.”

Yeah, sometimes one has to go further than you thought you wanted to go, to take steps you hadn’t thought you needed to take — to avoid the excrement in your environment.

– P

Puffery. Lies by another name?

the_tm9_turf_mat_credit_toyota_roof_garden

I saw the emergence recently of a new ‘grassroots’ lobbying group and, unlike some spluttering online commenters, chuckled to see the personnel involved.

It would be unfair and potentially misleading to call David Farrar, Jordan Williams and John Bishop members of a government/public relations rogues’ gallery, so I won’t.

And anyway, seriously, how could anyone scold a fellow who promotes himself in such a charming fashion on Twitter …

Disarming potted bio from Jordan 'I am not a lobbyist, oh hang on, yes I am this week' Williams.

Disarming potted bio from Jordan “I am not a lobbyist! Oh hang on. Yes I am this week.” Williams.

In related news, I spotted this article, The Perils of Puffery by Nicholas Mason mentioned by Andrew Sullivan at The Dish — eloquent as ever, in a reference to 18th-Century Sock Puppets.

What marketing theorists now call “astroturfing” was first dubbed “puffery” nearly 300 years ago and has remained one of advertising’s most effective tools ever since. The first widespread reports of puffery came in 1730s England, where a number of journalists and wits remarked on the recent shift from straightforward, unembellished announcements of goods for sale to elaborate schemes to trick consumers into buying shoddy merchandise.

Yeah, it’s like that y’all.

Some people will say anything they can (doesn’t matter whether it’s true) to gain an advantage.

Are you my sugar daddy?

David Farrar’s twee reference to ‘modest seed funding’ (below) obscures, it seems to me, the sugar daddy (or sugar daddies) behind his new ‘grassroots’ group.

We approached friends, colleagues and acquaintances and asked them if they were willing to support a dedicated voice for taxpayers, and many of them said yes. With some modest seed funding, we appointed Jordan as the Executive Director, gained some office space and started the job of having staff and volunteers scrutinising central and local government spending.

Peter Shirtcliffe’s name immediately sprang to my mind, given his reported backing of Jordan Williams’s last pre-election lobby group/PR campaign/set of training wheels, the failed anti-MMP effort which became so fixated on Winston Peters as ‘king maker’ — jettisoning its own ‘Pledges to New Zealand‘ to ‘Play the ball not the man’ among others things, along the way.

David Farrar’s launch epistle mentions ‘scrutinising’. That’s a great word.

Let’s do some of that.

Watch this space.

– P

Stress kills. Some more thoughts about litigation

From the Otago Daily Times

The death of the leading criminal defence lawyer Greg King was a wake-up call over the pressures facing some defence lawyers, Prof Mark Henaghan said yesterday.
Prof Henaghan, who is dean of the University of Otago Law Faculty, was commenting yesterday at an outdoor memorial service on campus, attended by about 50 people, including several senior Dunedin lawyers.
At the early evening service honouring the memory of Mr King, an Otago law graduate, a kowhai tree was planted near the Water of Leith to mark the occasion.
The Society of University of Otago Law Students said it had organised the event to honour one of the most esteemed graduates of both the faculty and the university.
The coroner found in October that Mr King’s death in Wellington in November 2012 had been self-inflicted. And a note left by him described being “totally burnt out” after taking on so many criminal defence cases.

I read that Greg King took his own life after suffering what the coroner’s report called a “massive breakdown”, describing his own state in his suicide note as “exhausted, unwell, disillusioned, depressed and haunted”.

It really saddens me to think of one of our country’s brightest lawyers coming under such strain and pressure, and seeing no way out. Terribly sad.

My heart goes out to Greg King’s family.

SG-foyer.jpg

The real ‘costs’ of litigation

Having myself been involved in pursuing a civil litigation in the past (for copyright infringement) I know it can be stressful (and expensive) for the parties involved … but I had not seen it as such for the lawyers.

With all due respect to lawyers (and no reflection on Greg King) there’s something about the way the system works, particularly in civil litigation, that sometimes sees legal professionals emerge as the only ‘winners’ in a dispute — their clients milked of whatever fees can be wrung out of them, the parties exhausted and disillusioned.

By a drip-drip-drip, lawyers bill their clients. Fair enough. Sometimes the process is necessary and even educational. I learnt the word ‘lacuna’ from one of my lawyers, when he was describing why the (relatively) quick-and-easy legal strategy we’d initially decided on might possibly not work … putting us on a more expensive path. Rats!

Clearly, there’s far less at stake in a civil dispute than there is in a murder case of the sort Greg King specialised in, or even, say, in a ‘white-collar crime’ case (e.g. fraud, embezzlement, criminal deceit, conspiracy, using a document to deceive, etc.) … those cases the Financial Markets Authority, the Serious Fraud Office, and the Commerce Commission have been pursuing with such élan lately in their ‘clean up’ efforts.

There must be enormous stress in a court prosecution, where the defendant doesn’t have the option available in most civil disputes: reaching a settlement agreement to shut things down.
Continue reading →

Another brick crumbles

Remember Facebook announced they were going to remove the ability to not be ‘found’ on their network by ‘non friends’? (Facebook. le sigh.)

Well, it’s rolling out … I just got this email …

Service with a smile, so long as you do it their way.

Service with a smile, so long as you do it their way.

Note the use of language: ‘old setting’ you’ve ‘used in the past’. (Actually, no, I use it NOW Facebook. You’re taking away something I use now.)

– P

Xero. Things that make you go ‘Hmmm…’

It can’t be just me that reads a line like this …

It’s been less than three weeks since Xero’s valuation passed through the $3 billion mark.
[Now it’s $4 billion]

… and thinks, Hmm. Bubble-ish?

Click to read at NZHerald.co.nz

Click to read at NZHerald.co.nz

I’ve got no insider or any other knowledge of the Xero company nor do I own any shares in it, nor its competitors.

I remember someone years ago asking me: Would you ever buy a stock at its all-time high?
Hmm. Probably not, I replied. Cautiously, maybe.
Well if you wouldn’t, you would have missed out on a ten year bull run on Microsoft shares, he said.
Oh.

– P

The escape of exnzpat, Part 16

An unexpected place

 

Mia drove.

Her big, wide car slowed as it turned on Erehwon Street’s narrow lane.  She felt the house before she saw it.  Its breath was hot, stale, and stank of death.  It came to her, carried easily within the porous membranes of the hot summer air.  She pushed it away and took in the rest of the street.

Tall oaks lined the street and many of the homes were shaded in delightful relief from the sun above.  All but number φ had a cool pleasant look to them.  The house sat back a ways.  It was bare of trees but for a few whiskered shrubs that seemed to wilt before the house and the towering sun overhead.

The lawn was kept, but it was untidy with weeds that crawled like snake-vine across it; their pale, leafy heads quailed and squabbled under the sun’s unrelenting heat.

There was an untidy fringe of hedge under the front windows.  Blanched and stickled with thorn the hedge had rubbed and scratched at the house, helping the sun in its job of peeling away its already faded paint.

The house was a very sorry thing to look at.  And the bare lawn behind it and its brown boarded windows projected a character of neglect.  Mia saw two cars parked in its driveway, but even so, it was easy to tell that no one lived within the house’s forgotten walls.  To normal eyes, the house was pathetic.

But Mia saw more, for her sight was not normal. Continue reading →

Close your eyes and listen to what John Palino said

Maybe it’s my background in radio journalism, or the fact that I have what educators call an ‘auditory learning style’ (or maybe these are the same thing?) but sometimes I find the pictures on TV distracting, or obscuring of the heart of a matter.

Yes I know, of course, there are times when the body language of an interviewee — their unspoken but very real communication — tells the story.

I watched Campbell LIVE’s intrepid Rebecca Wright doorstep Auckland mayoral candidate John Palino (video here if you haven’t seen it) and, sure, it was awkward.

Click to watch the video at Campbell LIVE

Click to watch the video at Campbell LIVE

But LISTEN to the conversation/confrontation (pick one) below, and see what you think …
Continue reading →

Spotted on a wall. Fill in the last part.

humansbeinghuman

I saw this incomplete* slogan on a wall near where I parked for the Armageddon expo at the weekend. Looks like the ‘artist’ was interrupted, because a school caretaker would probably have made more impact if they’d been washing it off.

What do you think the last word(s) would have been?

– P

* Or maybe it’s gestalt?

Dumb headline apart, this exchange between Keller & Greenwald on journalism is a great read

Click to read at NYTImes.com

Click to read at NYTImes.com

A seriously good read. Go ahead: Is Glenn Greenwald the Future of News? — NYTimes.com

We come at journalism from different traditions. I’ve spent a life working at newspapers that put a premium on aggressive but impartial reporting, that expect reporters and editors to keep their opinions to themselves unless they relocate (as I have done) to the pages clearly identified as the home of opinion. You come from a more activist tradition — first as a lawyer, then as a blogger and columnist, and soon as part of a new, independent journalistic venture financed by the eBay founder Pierre Omidyar. Your writing proceeds from a clearly stated point of view.

My reaction to it may be different to yours. So, let me know.

This is relevant too:

from Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, in an article about the Edward Snowden revelations, The Snowden Leaks and the Public — New York Review of books

The Guardian itself inhabits an editorial space that is quite distinct from most American newspapers. British papers have grown up with less reverence for the notions of objectivity and detachment that can, rightly or wrongly, preoccupy some of our American colleagues. The paper started as The Manchester Guardian—an outsider to the sometimes cozy world of Fleet Street. Though it’s long since dropped “Manchester” from its masthead, its mentality is still that of the outsider—and it’s fair to say that it is regarded by some British journalists with the sort of distrust that members of a club feel about visitors.

– P

Update: Summary of the Keller/Greenwald interchange by Mathew Ingram here —
Glenn Greenwald vs. the NYT’s Bill Keller on objectivity and the future of journalism

Social engineering!

It’s GST return time in my empire. Look what fell out of the envelope …

You want to do it by paper? Pay for your own stamps, sucker.

You want to do it by paper? Pay for your own stamps, sucker.

This is, of course, just a day or two after NZ Post announced the laying off of hundreds of posties because falling mail volumes means they’ll be dropping urban ‘standard post’ delivery back to three days a week. (See: Hundreds of posties to lose jobs, deliveries cut — Radio NZ News)

What an interconnected world we live in.

– P

Orchestrating smear campaigns against your rivals is seen as dodgy in business, so what about politics?

Taiwan Body Fines Samsung for Blasting Local Rival - ABC News

Click to read at abcnews.com

South Korean cellphone manufacturer Samsung has been censured and fined for organising a campaign to denigrate one of its competitors by paying for derogatory comments to be posted on the internet.

According to a finding by Taiwan’s Fair Trade Commission Samsung paid contractors to pose as cellphone users and post comments which attacked rival HTC’s products and boosted its own. The consumer protection body found that Samsung had deliberately acted to undermine its rival’s reputation and fined Samsung US$340,000.

Pretty scummy and unethical behaviour by Samsung. That’s not normal business practice, is it?

In a related zone, it’s been intriguing to hear how others have reacted to attack dog Cameron Slater expressing his deeply cynical views of politics, in discussion about his online campaign to discredit Auckland Mayor Len Brown:

Well, Auckland politics is the same as where any politics is, in that it’s a dirty, disgusting, despicable game. And it involves dirty, disgusting, despicable people at all levels.

Yeah, well, not surprising. I’ve commented before how the wonky tribalism that Cameron Slater and his ilk are imbued with seeks to justify their own team’s nasty attack politics and dodgy tactics by chanting (like japa beads) and reciting all the ‘dirty tricks’ they imagine their rivals have played on them.

Trust me, these types really do sit around saying ‘The [fill-in-the-gap] Party is sooo dirty!’ … and hatching schemes to use dirty tricks against them. Clearly, this bitter, hallucination-driven ‘activism’ (retch) is not confined to any ‘side’ of politics.

But something about Cameron’s attention-seeking loutishness and his apparent willingness to stoop lower and engage in ugly, protracted character assassination gives him a profile — which he’s entitled to. He’s earned it. Some I know working in the media regard Cameron Slater as a sycophant or a performing seal. Some just despise him.
Continue reading →

Some people use this as a checklist, some as a menu

I spotted this poster in the student health centre at my son’s new school (for next year).

It made me consider the actions of some who seem to cycle their way though these behaviours without any apparent balance or accountability.

Worth considering.

Then there’s this, from a blog post-combined-with-a-bit-of-self-promotion (no foul) by reputation management company CEO Michael Fertik: Revenge Porn is Not Free Speech

Recently, California – where I live – passed a new law that outlaws revenge porn. And that’s a great thing.
Revenge porn is when someone releases intimate video or photos of someone online, where they proliferate forever, linked permanently with a person’s name.
It’s a hugely personal betrayal, a violation of the deepest order. Imagine someone you trusted, perhaps even deeply loved, sharing a visual of you at your most vulnerable for all to see.
It’s recurring degradation, in the form of search results that continually humiliate a person in the eyes of future romantic prospects, colleagues, friends, family, hiring managers, you name it. …

Are we ever going to get the cyber-bullying genie back in the bottle? Is it possible? Even with legislation like that?

Seriously, private citizens and those in ‘public life’ are defamed at will by louts with an empathy-bypass, those who act to ‘destroy’ others, with little apparent regard or consideration for the collateral damage they cause.

Two Australian radio DJs who spoofed a nurse supervising a royal princess’s care in hospital into revealing ‘news’ (trivia) have been, we are told, traumatised by the fact of the nurse’s subsequent suicide in the wake of their prank. I would be deeply regretful in their case too … but let’s not forget the victims.

– P

The cat sat on the Mac

Nice pic from TUAW reader Richard

Cat-on-Mac

Very mice. (not a typo)

– P

Update: And then there’s this …

Pic; Alex Nelson flickr (click)

Pic: Alex Nelson flickr (click)

Dealing with something new in your environment

This very cool photo, taken through the periscope of a US Navy submarine which had surfaced through ice in Arctic Ocean, shows a polar bear — investigating something remarkable, novel and outside its previous experience. (Well, I assume it hadn’t encountered a nuclear submarine’s tail fin before, but I can’t be certain.) Thinks: What is this new thing I am dealing with? What do I do about it?

Apr. 27, 2003: A polar bear approaches the tail of the USS Connecticut, a Sea Wolf-class nuclear submarine, after it surfaced through ice in the Arctic Ocean. The photo was taken through the periscope of the submarine, which was on exercises in the Arctic. (AP PHOTO/U.S. NAVY) via Fox News -  click

Apr. 27, 2003: A polar bear approaches the tail of the USS Connecticut, a Sea Wolf-class nuclear submarine, after it surfaced through ice in the Arctic Ocean. The photo was taken through the periscope of the submarine, which was on exercises in the Arctic. (AP PHOTO/U.S. NAVY) via Fox News – click

Questions like those the curious polar bear must have been asking — What *is* this new thing in my environment? How should I approach it? — remind me of a talk I heard at a new-age personal development workshop years ago which in essence said, When we’re born, we ask ourselves two questions: Who are these giants? and How do I need to behave to survive in their world?

I’ve come to see that how we answer those questions — the conclusions we draw — can actually shape our personalities at a deep level, with effects far into our lives. A lot of psycho-analysis (and other forms of client-centred counselling) is, at root, trying to bring our submerged conclusions — and our internal ‘model’ for how the world works — to to the surface for examination. (Sometimes we have to crack through ice — see why the pic works?)

It can be very personally enabling and powerful when you ‘click’ to a realization that you act a certain way in certain situations because of a long-buried thought or conclusion. “So that’s why I react to […] that way! Wow.”

I know from my work that co-dependent conduct (yes, it’s a buzzword, but stay with me) sometimes really, really damaging behaviours and other addictions, can grow out of a wonky conclusion we reached at a young age. ‘Young and impressionable’ is a cliché, right? For a reason.

Continue reading →

“Sleazy gutter politics is not my style” by @imperatorfish

Oh, you must* read this wonderful spoof by Scott Yorke: A statement from John Palino

Click to read Scott Yorke's satiric 'Palino statement'.

Click to read Scott Yorke’s satiric ‘Palino statement’.

Nice. A highlight (for me): “Your decision to talk to Cameron Slater disappoints me, and no good will come of it. If I were you I would just forget about the whole thing. Move on with your life, and try to put this episode behind you.”

Good work.

– P

* Published at the risk of appearing to be part of the echo-chamber. (I mean, isn’t that part of what social media is good for?)