“If book publishers are supposed to be the gatekeepers…”

First raised in a comment here, this story of a fabricated Enola Gay memoir, an imaginary PhD supposedly issued and withdrawn by Victoria University of Wellington (my Alma Mater) complete with “baseless and defamatory” allegations of a hot debate about evolutionary theory (!) … well, the whole thing just gets more and more interesting …

Read all about it in the New York Times

Last week Henry Holt & Company stopped printing and selling “The Last Train From Hiroshima,” about the atomic bombing of Japan, because its author had relied on a fraudulent source for a portion of the book and possibly fabricated others.

Erring on the side of ‘simple’

A police investigation into ‘stolen’ or ‘leaked’ emails from the Leader of the Opposition’s office reveals just how slack so-called computer security can be… until we have reason to beef it up. I bet they’re more security-conscious now!

“While it is accepted by the experts interviewed that external hacking can never be fully eliminated, ‘hacking’ of the Parliamentary Services computer is not considered to be how the offence was committed,” the investigation report stated.

It suggested two ways in which the emails might have been obtained – Dr Brash may have been using an “auto forward” function on his email accounts, or someone else had used computers or laptops that had access to them.

The investigation found gaps in security access to Parliament’s third floor, meaning there were opportunities to grab sensitive documents in electronic or hard copy form.
It noted that Dr Brash printed documents at night to collect in the morning and left documents in his out-tray for shredding, which was not attended to regularly.
He and an associate, whose identity is protected in the report, left their laptops unattended while logged on.

The report quoted computer company Axon’s service delivery manager, Deborah Clarke, as suggesting attitudes towards security in Parliament were too relaxed. “They want all the security in the world but they’re not prepared to live through the fundamentals of doing what you have to do to make sure you maintain security,” she said. “So they don’t let us implement complex passwords.”

From the NZ Herald

Footnote: Of course, Dr Brash wouldn’t have had to resign if the contents of the leaked/stolen emails wasn’t so politically damaging. Crikey dick, it wasn’t Nicky Hager’s book The Hollow Men that destroyed Brash’s political career. It was just the truth about those communications (or a version of it) coming out!

Engaging… (iPad)

I’m not all aquiver like some of the media, but this DOES look like a new doorway to me…

Cool.

(Premiered during TV coverage of the 2010 Academy Awards today.)

When propaganda turns into ‘demonizing’ …

Sometimes a zealot can go ‘too far’ …. even for his/her own supporters.
I’ve seen it in political debate. I’ve seen it in business.
The ‘object’ of the exercise — the debate, the contest of ideas — becomes somehow personal, and the ‘campaign’ can start to lose focus.

It can be like a blood lust in combat or what Robert McNamara (Kennedy/Johnson Secretary of Defence) called “The Fog of War“.

I don’t know Liz Cheney but, judging from this, it looks like she may have wandered into this undergrowth … (it can happen to any of us if we feel strongly enough about something).

First, watch this propaganda:

As we discussed last time we talked about Joseph McCarthy, put yourself in the shoes of the ‘targets’ of this stuff. Are they being treated fairly? How ‘decent’ is the behaviour of the critic?*

Conservatives Turn Against Liz Cheney – As Bad As McCarthy

The backlash is growing against Liz Cheney after she demonized Department of Justice attorneys as terrorist sympathizers for their past legal work defending Gitmo detainees — and now it’s coming from within deeply conservative legal circles.

On Friday, the conservative blog Power Line put up a post titled, “An Attack That Goes Too Far.” Author Paul Mirengoff, called Cheney’s effort to brand DoJ officials the “Al Qaeda 7,” “vicious” and “unfounded” even if it was right to criticize defense lawyers for voluntarily doing work on behalf of Gitmo detainees.

Reached on the phone, Mirengoff offered an even sharper rebuke, contrasting what Cheney is doing to the anti-communist crusades launched by Sen. Joseph McCarthy and, in some respects, finding it worse.

“It could be worse than some of the assertions made by McCarthy, depending on some of the validity of those assertions,” Mirengoff said, explaining that at least McCarthy was correct in pinpointing individuals as communist sympathizers. “It is just baseless to suggest that [these DoJ officials] share al Qaeda values… they didn’t actually say it but I think it was a fair implication of what they were saying.”

from Huffington Post

Targeting individuals is always tricky. Motivations are near-impossible to divine. ‘Sympathies’ even more so. There’s usually a whole lot of hallucination going on.

I hope Ms Cheney and her cohorts take the opportunity to re-calibrate, and question their approach. What harm can that do?

* The other side of this is that sometimes one feels called to be the universe’s feedback mechanism to people who are acting wrongly (however you define that). As I said here: Continue reading →

Neither one nor the other…

The profession “blogger” is still not considered “journalism”,
depending on whom you ask and the time of day.

Comment 42 from ‘Gus2000’ on Roughly Drafted Magazine blog re Daniel attending and asking questions at the recent Apple shareholder meeting but not being ‘allowed’ to report them.

Gus has it right. (But for how long?)

I love geeks

From the support FAQ page of Instapaper (following the normal software-specific support Q’s):

Why does my iced coffee taste so bland?

It’s probably diluted with too much melted ice. Brew it more strongly and chill it before serving — never pour hot coffee over ice.

The ice should only be used to keep it cold, not to make it cold.

You can also try cold-brewing, although mine didn’t work out.

Nice one Marco.

Asperger’s. Of course. Are we surprised?

thebigshort

Michael Lewis takes an unexpected corner in this excellent book extract about the bursting of the (US) subprime bubble.

From his new book The Big Short (they’re ALL very good, from Liar’s Poker onwards), this chapter Betting on the Blind Side is about a gutsy, insightful fund manager called Michael Burry. This extract at Vanity Fair. Worth reading.

Not long before, his wife had dragged him to the office of a Stanford psychologist. A pre-school teacher had noted certain worrying behaviors in their four-year-old son, Nicholas, and suggested he needed testing. Nicholas didn’t sleep when the other kids slept. He drifted off when the teacher talked at any length. His mind seemed “very active.” Michael Burry had to resist his urge to take offense. He was, after all, a doctor, and he suspected that the teacher was trying to tell them that he had failed to diagnose attention-deficit disorder in his own son. “I had worked in an A.D.H.D. clinic during my residency and had strong feelings that this was overdiagnosed,” he said. “That it was a ‘savior’ diagnosis for too many kids whose parents wanted a medical reason to drug their children, or to explain their kids’ bad behavior.” He suspected his son was a bit different from the other kids, but different in a good way. “He asked a ton of questions,” said Burry. “I had encouraged that, because I always had a ton of questions as a kid, and I was frustrated when I was told to be quiet.” Now he watched his son more carefully and noted that the little boy, while smart, had problems with other people. “When he did try to interact, even though he didn’t do anything mean to the other kids, he’d somehow tick them off.” He came home and told his wife, “Don’t worry about it! He’s fine!”

His wife stared at him and asked, “How would you know?”

To which Dr. Michael Burry replied, “Because he’s just like me! That’s how I was.”

Continue reading →

Quote of the week

“We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours”

— Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs announcing IP/patent lawsuit against HTC.

It’ll be interesting to see how this works out.

“God was telling me the other day …” Oh yes?

Interesting bits of news on the “God was telling me” front today
image: jimconte.com

image: jimconte.com

First, an even greedier-than-usual fundraising effort at Destiny Church appears to have sparked an ‘exodus’ — a step too far for their Brisbane pastor and his flock, according to news reports. TV3 News reported it last night, and the NZ Herald chimed in

Destiny Church ministers and leaders are heading to its Brisbane branch after more than half the congregation – including its pastor – walked out. Bishop Brian Tamaki, who founded the church in New Zealand in 1998, is expected to be among those heading to Australia this week after the resignation of Pastor Andrew Stock.

It is believed Pastor Stock – who has been at the Brisbane branch pulpit for about three years – withdrew from his role because a newly introduced covenant went against his beliefs, a member said. … the covenant told members to “give it heaps” as they worked towards a $3 million project which included building a $1.3 million budget to go towards putting Bishop Tamaki on TVNZ every morning, from Monday to Friday.

The covenant also encouraged members to go without coffee, takeaways and Sky TV for up to seven months to help give more in their church tithes. The church member, who did not want to be named for fear of repercussions, said up to 70 people of the just over 100-strong congregation followed Pastor Andrew Stock, after a four-minute speech, as he walked out of the church with his family.

And funnily enough, the very day that story reporting so-called ‘Christian’ greed emerged, a local spruiker blogged this tripe as marketing for his ‘mentoring services’:

One of the most empowering moments in my life was when God spoke to me directly and said: “Shady* (not his real name), are you ever going to stop feeling guilty about making money[?] Are you ever going to take the abilities I gave you and create wealth so that you can give more away?”

That one frank moment so changed my life that I now engage mentors and people who will tell me the truth about myself at every opportunity. Who are you going to put into YOUR life to do this for you today?

Oh dear. So Moses gets angels in burning bushes, a message to confront the Egyptians about enslaving the Israelites, and a mission to lead them into the promised land … and this dubious character says he hears God speaking directly:When are you going to stop feeling guilty about making money?
How convenient. (Not that there is anything to feel guilty about if you’re making money ethically, instead of just saying you are.)

Bear in mind this is from the same duplicitous rooster who announced to the world that he’d stayed silent about a situation of financial wrongdoing because God told him repeatedly to keep quietContinue reading →

That’s a LOT of page views … (and SPAM & bots)

JESS3 / The State of The Internet from Jesse Thomas on Vimeo.

That’s not copyright theft. It’s ‘intertextual mixing’… (Yeah, right!)

“Ooops, you caught me passing off someone else’s work as my own.”

From The Independent

Shortly after Ms Hegemann’s book appeared, a blogger pointed out that passages of it bore an uncanny similarity to Strobo. In one case a whole page had simply been lifted from Strobo and planted in [her book]. …

“There was really no need for her to copy me,” insisted Airen in an interview with Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine. “But she borrowed entire passages of my dialogue. I feel that my copyright has been infringed.”

In an artful attempt to steal their critics’ thunder Ms Hegemann and her publishers have gone on the offensive. They have managed, in part, to turn what at face value appeared to be a clearcut case of stealing somebody else’s words into a wide-ranging debate about the meaning of plagiarism in the online era. They argue that [her book] is merely an example of modern ” intertextual mixing“. [Comment: Oh. That’s OK, then. Thanks for explaining that. (Not!)]

Interviewed last week about the charges, Ms Hegemann’s defence was simply “I cannot understand what all the fuss is about.” [Comment: Then grow up!]
While she acknowledges that she used numerous “sources” for her book, she also claims that she is a member of a different generation of writers which is used to adapting and using the abundance of information available online for its own creative purposes.

“I remember sentences my friends tell me just as much as I take on the ideas of the Slovenian critical theorist Slavoj Zizek,” she told Der Spiegel, which described her as a “know-all”. “I went everywhere I could find inspiration,” she said about her book, and added:
“There is no such thing as originality anyway, there is just authenticity.”

That last line “There is no such thing as originality anyway…” is pretty easy to say from that side of the equation, don’t you think?

Hey, we’ve all been inspired by other writers, and even consciously or subconsciously adopted something from somebody somewhere… but word-for-word, image-for-image, point-by-point is OUT, unless you say where you got it, in my opinion. Acknowledge your sources.

Let’s call a spade a spade: she’s a plagiarist.
‘Online age’ ‘new generation’ poppycock makes no difference. That blogger published his work, she pinched it (without attribution)… which is exactly what got Witi Ihimaera into so much mal odour.

Case closed.

Another good view of it from Laura Miller at Salon.com:

This would be more plausible if Hegemann had acknowledged from the beginning that she’d included work from other writers in [her book] but by all indications, she did not.

Quite a good quiz

Quiz: prime ministers v the media

From The Guardian

Prime ministers and journalists have often had a difficult relationship. As Lance Price reveals in a new book, Where Power Lies: Prime Ministers v the Media (from which these quotes are taken), the two sides have been criticising each other, in similar terms, for years. This should become clear if you try to work out who said what.

1. Who told the political editor of the Daily Mirror: “The only message the prime minister has for Daily Mirror readers is: don’t buy it”?

• Winston Churchill when Stanley Baldwin was PM
• Brendan Bracken when Winston Churchill was PM
• Bernard Ingham when Margaret Thatcher was PM
• Alastair Campbell when Tony Blair was PM

Bit of a giggle… read on

Keith Olbermann: ‘My Father Asked Me To Kill Him’ (VIDEO)

This is a worthwhile (and pretty tough) lead-in to a conversation about US healthcare reform and the “death panel” lies that are still swirling (fed by lobbyists and cynical attention-seeking politicians) … (via Huffington Post)

“Last Friday night, my father asked me to kill him.”

Keith Olbermann opened his emotional Special Comment on health care Wednesday with the story of his father’s six-month-long hospitalization suffering through a colon removal, pneumonia, kidney failure, liver failure, and many infections.

After a particularly difficult week, Olbermann said he went into his father’s hospital room to find him “thrashing his head back and forth” and mouthing the word “Help.”

“It was just too much for my father,” Olbermann said. “‘Stop this,’ he mouths. ‘Stop, stop, stop.'”

Olbermann said he resorted to gallows humor, asking his father, “What, you want me to smother you with a pillow?” And his father responded, mouthing, “Yes, kill me.”

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I had a similar experience (the urgent request, call, appeal — earnest, full frontal) from someone I cared about very much last year. There were times we just wept at the suffering, wave after wave … all of it frightening, unspeakable, unknowable … until you’re ‘there’.

He’s right. Have the “life” talk sooner rather than later – P

Where the slippery slope of deception ends …

(image: movies.yahoo.com)

(image: movies.yahoo.com)

A scandal is whipping through the internet about a tech reporter/blogger called Randall C. Kennedy who “invented” an alter-ego as an “expert” source for info about a speciality area of computing. He even posed as his fake self when giving interviews to other reporters!

Sucker/innocent victim ComputerWorld writer Gregg Keizer reflects on lies and liars and ‘the slippery slope of deception’ …

One of the more interesting people I’ve talked with in the last two years is a figment of his own imagination.

“Craig Barth,” the chief technology officer of Florida-based Devil Mountain Software, a company that makes and markets Windows performance metrics software, is, I have discovered, nobody. He doesn’t exist.

Barth is, in fact, a nom de plume, which is a fancy, French way of saying “alias.” The real man behind the curtain is Randall C. Kennedy, a popular, sometimes outrageous blogger for and frequent contributor to InfoWorld, a publication that like Computerworld is part of IDG. Kennedy’s connection to InfoWorld was severed on Friday.

The two, Barth and Kennedy, are one and the same. The problem was that I didn’t know that. The problem was that Kennedy didn’t tell me he was Barth, that I didn’t figure out Barth was he, and that together, they were Devil Mountain.

It’s a piece worth reading in its entirety, and a few key points about lies are well made:

Here’s the bare-faced lie:

But on Friday, after I confronted Barth with evidence that linked him to Kennedy — I didn’t yet know they were one and the same — he assured me that although the two had worked together in the past, and in fact, now worked together at Devil Mountain, any allegations that he and Kennedy were the same person were ridiculous. Two hours later, I received an e-mail from Kennedy, who I’d e-mailed separately.

“Time to level with you,” Kennedy wrote. “The individual Craig Barth doesn’t exist. It’s a pseudonym I created a decade ago while writing news copy for Windows NT Magazine. … “What began as a simple e-mail exchange of benchmark data two years ago snowballed, as all such white lies tend to do, into the mess we have today,” he [Kennedy] added.

Lie” it is, “white” it’s not. And “mess” doesn’t begin to describe the fall-out over Kennedy’s disguising his identity to InfoWorld, Computerworld, and other news organizations and blogs, including the Associated Press, WindowsITPro, and Gizmodo.

During every interview with Barth since late 2007, I came away convinced he knew what he was talking about. On Friday, Kennedy claimed that everything but his identity was legit … Obviously, that’s moot now. Readers who scoffed at the data he presented last week have all that much more reason to doubt. Even people who accepted the data as valid, like me, have to wonder where the slippery slope of deception ends.

Yes, it’s like that with liars. Continue reading →

Ace communicator or duplicitous spruiker? (VIDEO)

No_sharks_logo_100 by Peter Aranyi

There are certain ‘sales types’ who veer so close to Con artists and scammers that you wonder why the ‘authorities’ don’t shut the lying bastards down.

Newly-bankrupt Mark Bryers of Blue Chip seems to fit into that category, judging by some of the material I’ve seen privately and from reports in the media and from former Blue Chip employees and licensees.

I’m engaged in a conversation with friends at present about the latest marketing bullshit from someone local who is much less impressive.

These ‘Operators’ are commonly compulsive liars. Any remotely long-term observation of them shows that they just can’t keep their story straight. They drop back to their door-to-door hustler, two-bit salesman roots and end up telling lie after lie after lie … eventually tripping up.

Sadly, some use a born-again-religion smokescreen to disarm their victims. They loudly trumpet their own salvation and new-found ‘ethics’ (‘I was lost but now I’m found’) as a way to draw people into the net. Some use the ‘I was (financially) lame but now I’m healed (rich)’ con. It’s a bit like the ‘misdirection’ trick stage magicians use to cover their sleight-of-hand.

Sometimes they say the exact opposite of the truth, knowing most people don’t expect bare-faced lies. Continue reading →