I noted this photo credit: “Photo / Supplied by Facebook” in the NZ Herald‘s front page story today.
Whatever. I’m not that critical, and, in this case, it’s probably fine with the ‘subject’ … but what do you think?:
Is it OK for news media to take and re-publish items from someone’s Facebook profile? (And in this case, it was huge on the front page! – see right)
What if they wanted to illustrate a story about a crime? Or a tragedy? That’s been done, certainly — with or without permission.
Not a new question — but I was struck by the oddly-worded credit: ‘Supplied by Facebook’
– P
Is it possible it was? I’m pretty sure you grant Facebook a license to your stuff, and I’m sure Facebook would love the opportunity to monetise this by selling publishers the right to use their users’ pictures.
I’ll ask.
Update: No answer yet.
Then there’s this kind of thing:
Original artwork by Twitter user @nintendoug:
… appropriated with inadequate* credit by someone using the name ‘Cameron Slater’…
*Well, that’s my opinion. What do you think?
I had the same thoughts as you on seeing that photo Peter.
Luckily for the girl in question, it’s a lovely pic and – I think – tends to endear the average reader towards her. She is also obviously very eloquent and well-written, and has a supportive family behind her and a good attitude, so I hope she does well for herself (and for her little baby boy).
I do think it’s a bit rough that the Herald used her photo without asking her first, though: she’s already shown huge courage in penning her letter, but I don’t know if she really wanted her face splashed across the front of the Herald. She’s still just a kid, really; hard enough having to learn to be a mum without dealing with unwanted attention from strangers who recognize her from the papers, too.
Cheers Debbie – P
And here’s what happens when the ‘pinch a pic off Facebook’ strategy goes wrong … http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11300272