What side 1981 NZH ad

Political activism is carried out for all sorts of reasons, by all sorts of people, in a variety of guises.

The 1981 Springbok Rugby Tour divided families, households, workplaces … and the nation. Our current Prime Minister John Key “can’t even remember” whether he was for or against the tour, or the anti-Apartheid civil disobedience protests which sought to frustrate it.

People from nuns and clergymen, students and teachers, sportsmen and women, superannuitants, and others massed for the most violently repressed public protests this country has ever seen. But Mr Key was “sort of somewhat ambivalent about it” although he says he “was always interested in politics”. Hmmm.

What would get YOU marching in the streets? If not state asset sales, benefit cuts, land confiscation, how about expanded powers for state spying and surveillance of computer and telephone communications? How about corruption in our electoral system?

Danyl McLauchlan’s post at the Dim Post, comparing media reactions to left wing policy versus right wing policy  is worth reading. So are the comments. It made me think.

Graphic: by Joe Wylie. Photo: right wing political activist David Farrar shrieking to a mob about the Electoral Finance Act limiting corporate donations to political parties. (Quelle horreur!)

‘Economic saboteurs’ graphic: Joe Wylie via DimPost.wordpress.com. Photo (ex scoop.co.nz): National Party political activist and manipulator David Farrar inflaming a mob (of reporters, mainly) about the Electoral Finance Act limiting corporate donations to political parties. Quelle horreur! See below.

The Electoral Finance Act placed restrictions on the amounts people could donate to political parties and to the amounts ‘third parties’ – groups that are not political parties but that try to influence an election – could spend during an election campaign. The act also tightened up the rules around anonymous donations and the authorisation of election advertisements. It was repealed in 2009.

– P