From a recent article by Pentagon Papers Whistleblower (and one of my heroes) Daniel Ellsberg:
An activist colleague recently said to me: “I hear you’re supporting Obama.”
I was startled, and took offense. “Supporting Obama? Me?!”
“I lose no opportunity publicly,” I told him angrily, to identify Obama as a tool of Wall Street, a man who’s decriminalized torture and is still complicit in it, a drone assassin, someone who’s launched an unconstitutional war, supports kidnapping and indefinite detention without trial, and has prosecuted more whistleblowers like myself than all previous presidents put together. “Would you call that support?”
My friend said, “But on Democracy Now you urged people in swing states to vote for him! How could you say that? I don’t live in a swing state, but I will not and could not vote for Obama under any circumstances.”
My answer was: a Romney/Ryan administration would be no better — no different — on any of the serious offenses I just mentioned or anything else, and it would be much worse, even catastrophically worse, on a number of other important issues: attacking Iran, Supreme Court appointments, the economy, women’s reproductive rights, health coverage, safety net, climate change, green energy, the environment.
I told him: “I don’t ‘support Obama.’ I oppose the current Republican Party. This is not a contest between Barack Obama and a progressive candidate. The voters in a handful or a dozen close-fought swing states are going to determine whether Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are going to wield great political power for four, maybe eight years, or not.”
From Progressives: In Swing States, Vote for Obama by Daniel Ellsberg
President Obama’s about face on whistleblowers — promising to protect them in the name of transparent government but once in office overseeing an administration that persecutes them while pardoning the disgraceful cynical torturers — is my deepest disappointment with him.
But like Ellsberg, I see Etch-a-Sketch Romney and Lyin’ Ryan as a far worse alternative.
If I had a vote, it would be for Obama.
– P
This summary is the one the most honest things you have posted here.
And I agree 100%
I repeat, Obama is a two faced liar and has done nothing in his term And basically a poor example of a President.
But the Republicans have nothing to trump Obamas preaching.
Obama winning this time round is not a reflection of how well he has done but how poorly represented the team in Red are. Plus Obamabots bigots can not be swayed.
The republicans backed (at one point in history) Sarah Palin – a practicing moron.
Why would you vote for that party …
Obama got a nobel prize for doing nothing … he is unfortunately a living breathing example of how utterly stupid all sides of the political spectrum have become. And people still debate how the nazis managed to get into power.
Never learn …
He got a Nobel Peace prize for starting a War.
Here’s filmmaker Joss Whedon’s poker-faced Mitt Romney anti-‘endorsement’… calmly predicting a ‘Zomney Apocalypse’ … ‘the kind of chaos you can’t buy back’.
Best line: “[Mitt Romney] is not afraid to face a ravening, grasping horde of sub-humans ‘cos that’s how he sees poor people already…”
Not relevant to the US election, but I quite liked this article by Boris supporting the other side:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/borisjohnson/9639833/Newspapers-are-worth-fighting-for-even-when-theyre-wrong.html