A teacher of mine used to say: ‘The only person who knows how far is ‘too far’ is the person who goes too far.’
With respect, NO, sometimes it’s blindingly obvious for others to see. Such as The Huffington Post’s relentless ‘aggregation’ — ‘Driving traffic, Darling’, says Arianna Huffington justifying the activities of the largely parasitic enterprise bearing her [ex-Husband’s] name.
In my view, expressed here before, HuffPo cynically exploits other news organizations and writers by scraping their content and relentless (laughable once you twig to it) SEO-pimping. The decline in quality has been noticeable, and fighting that by pinching MORE stuff from others and token linking is weak sauce. See also:Plagiarism as a business model.
Here’s a post by online columnist Simon Dumenco writing at AdAge who objected to heavy-handed appropriation of his content and received an ‘apology’ with news that Huffington Post had ‘suspended indefinitely’ the underling writer who did it … ignoring the oh-so-obvious fact that she was merely doing as she had been shown to do in the culture of Huffington Post.
What It’s Like to Get Used and Abused by The Huffington Post
The Blog Queen Defends Her Aggregation Practices by Saying She Drives Traffic. Oh, Really?
By: Simon DumencoOne of the great and pressing questions of the post-blog age is: What constitutes unfair — unethical — aggregation? In the absence of a clear legal framework (the “fair use” doctrine in the U.S. is notoriously mushy), a lot of media people tend to use the “I know it when I see it” standard, echoing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s wry 1964 declaration about what constitutes hard-core porn.
Bill Keller, the outgoing editor of The New York Times, knows sketchy aggregation when he sees it. In his column in the Times Magazine in March, he famously attacked certain aggregators for “taking words written by other people, packaging them on your own Web site and harvesting revenue that might otherwise be directed to the originators of the material. In Somalia this would be called piracy.” He then added, “The queen of aggregation is, of course, Arianna Huffington.” …
Worth a read. And so is his follow-up.
Thanks for the Apology, Huffington Post. Now Please Apologize to the Writer You Suspended
An Open Letter From Our Media Guy to Peter S. Goodman
By: Simon Dumenco
Read ’em and weep.
John Gruber’s comment On attribution and credit seems a good way forward to me.
Huffington Post’s smash-and-grab performance was bad enough before the AOL purchase.
– P
A couple of worthwhile follows…
Huffington Post aggregation: What standards? By Erik Wemple
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/huffington-post-aggregation-what-standards/2011/07/12/gIQAqvLtAI_blog.html
Dumenco: Thanks for apology, but unethical aggregation is widespread at Huffington Post by Steve Myers
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/138952/dumenco-thanks-for-apology-but-unethical-aggregation-is-widespread-at-huffington-post/
Good, very self-aware and self-deprecating comment from Techmeme’s Gabe Rivera, which nails a distinction I tried to explain on Twitter yesterday, when I said
“HuffPo’s m.o. changed. Became greedy to hang on to traffic. Less willing to (at)tribute to source.”
http://gaberivera.tumblr.com/post/7564131893/lets-call-rewriters-rewriters-not-aggregators
Ripples in the pond …
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/07/did_the_huffington_post_make_a.html