This evil-looking device (right) is a Trocar self-piercing ventilation tube, used in medical procedures where inserting one of these into a patient’s infected body will help save their life through ‘aeration’ or by helping with ‘drainage of secretions’.
I bet inserting one of these hurts like hell. But it beats suffocating … or festering in toxic septicity.
I got thinking about this today when I received a toxic message, with threats, from someone claiming to be Russell Beaumont in response to my post: The dissatisfying hollowness of @BarnsleyBill, Russell Beaumont’s internet impostor.
The reply is a bit fraught so I’ll summarise and paraphrase it:
Ouch! Stop that. You are so HORRIBLE! I’m warning you: Cut it out.
— reader ‘Russell Beaumont’ (paraphrased)
The full Ode to The Paepae comes complete with bonus personal insults (some apparently his and some he claims are from Cameron Slater). Parts of it resemble a peeing competition.
‘Russell’ also lays out what he calls his “firm belief” (given my experience as a journalist, they appear to me to be hallucinations) about the New Zealand Herald‘s coverage of some recent news events … and he intimates legal action against me may follow should I ‘go further’:
I would caution you against going further with your accusations as my reputation is worth (to me) getting a lawyer involved and unlike most who infect the fringes of the NZ web space I have the means and sufficient levels of spitefulness to in fact do this.
Look, if the message I received really is from Russell Beaumont (and not the collective “one of three or four other people” apparently running his Twitter account) he claims a long history as an internet, um … presence (“since the newsgroup days”) using his BarnsleyBill handle.
Then he admits passing that profile on to some mates to use
Here’s the crux of it: We see THIS differently:
A year or two ago I “lent” the persona to some friends who were interested in blogging as my own enthusiasm began to wane.
Is that kinda like letting someone use your drivers licence?
That seems to tally with what the @BarnsleyBill sockpuppet told me yesterday: @BarnsleyBill is not ‘currently’ Russell Beaumont. In which case, speaking personally, that transaction strikes me as misleading. You may see it differently.
It’s also striking to me that my correspondent seems to admit he lacked the courage to comment on the internet in his own name — or, perhaps, to so self-moderate his comments that they wouldn’t injure his reputation(?) — then passed his pseudonymous free-wheeling ‘persona’ on to other people to operate …
…and now ‘Russell Beaumont’ seeks to shut me up?
Hmm.
– P
PS Russell (if it really is you) consider perhaps that it’s less ‘effort’ for me to ‘think and write’ than you imagine.
That is fantastic, esp “I would caution you against going further with your accusations as my reputation is worth (to me) getting a lawyer involved and unlike most who infect the fringes of the NZ web space I have the means and sufficient levels of spitefulness to in fact do this.”
I suggest he talk to his Boss about this, and I’m sure that his Boss will tell him to “HTFU, it’s what we do everyday, you pantywaisted little Pommy poof, now go back to gathering revenue from our Brothel/Money laundering/ P distributers” if that is what his Linkedin profile suggests, or as a distributer, he can do do a paper round like David Bain
Thanks for your comment, Ratty.
(I take it your references to “P distributors” and “money laundering” are satirical/hyperbolic exaggeration … since it seems unlikely a law-abiding publication would knowingly accept advertising from criminals. )
Your mention of the issues relating to raising advertising revenue from ‘dubious’ endeavours reminded me of an eye-opening discussion I had with the proprietor of a strip club (in his office, ahem) about advertising his services (wares?) in the NZ TRUTH newspaper.
I related it in an April 2009 thread at PropertyTalk, discussing the topic of integrity in advertising …
Funny to be reminded of that conversation.
– P
What? @BarnsleyBill cares about his reputation as what? I don’t understand why his behaviour isn’t legally fraudulent.
Hi Graeme,
Yes, I see your point. At what point does it become OK to “lend” someone your identity, or to pose as someone else?
Such impersonation strikes me as deceitful, and a step too far, as I have explained before here, not just in relation to the fake David Fisher profile. It seems morally dubious to me, to say the least.
see: http://www.thepaepae.com/anonymous-comment-vs-impersonation/13539/
I also find deep satire in the situation of my abusive correspondent who claims to be ‘Russell Beaumont’ getting huffy and threatening to engage a lawyer over his ‘reputation’ — for what, truthfulness?
Indeed, such threats if I question the plausibility of denials issued by a self-proclaimed multiple-writer Twitter sock puppet @BarnsleyBill … well, to me it’s ludicrous.
The question remains, ‘Who is behind the fake David Fisher Twitter profile?’ … which is also, it is claimed, operated by a multiple-writer ‘cabal’.
Draw your own conclusions.
– P
UPDATE: Ha! Funny, after writing this reply I went off for walk accompanied by Kimbra’s Vows album in my earphones … and her song Good Intent had something to say about reputation…
*Chuckle*
I love the image of the sock-puppet – it’s a whole take on “talk to the hand”! Maybe Mr Beaumont could learn from Johann Hari’s personal apology:
…Several years ago I started to notice some things I didn’t like in the Wikipedia entry about me, so I took them out. To do that, I created a user-name that wasn’t my own. Using that user-name, I continued to edit my own Wikipedia entry and some other people’s too. I took out nasty passages about people I admire – like Polly Toynbee, George Monbiot, Deborah Orr and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. I factually corrected some other entries about other people. But in a few instances, I edited the entries of people I had clashed with in ways that were juvenile or malicious: I called one of them anti-Semitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk. I am mortified to have done this, because it breaches the most basic ethical rule: don’t do to others what you don’t want them to do to you. I apologise to the latter group unreservedly and totally.
If it was the other way round – if a journalist I disapprove of had done something analogous – I’d be withering…
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-a-personal-apology-2354679.html
Nice quote, thanks Graeme.
‘Reputation’ and ‘good intent’ … but deceit is, well, deceit.
And yet, from the comments at the foot of that Hari apology:
Argh! – P
[…] As we’ve discussed recently, there’s a ‘cabal’ or two of impostors pretending to be other people for whatever various disclosed and undisclosed reasons (see Spoofing David Fisher and The dissatisfying hollowness of @BarnsleyBill, Russell Beaumont’s internet impostor and Let a little air in, @BarnsleyBill. […]
[…] PS Another version of the song here. […]