Some of us have always seen radio announcer Mike Hosking as a puffed-up little prat.
I was there at Broadcasting House when this shortish young guy with a big voice and a very strange manner arrived in the Network Newsroom. He’d come across from Radio NZ’s commercial network. We were one big happy family then – this was before the commercial network was spun off as The Radio Network. I still have the launch shirt with the TRN lollipop logo on the front somewhere. Mike was “23 going on 60,” as one newsroom wag described him.
Mike looked like a school leaver wearing his uncle’s suit. And shoes. He was prematurely conservative, a yokel with a clichéd radio jock’s voice, in the big smoke and in a big hurry. I worked with a reporter who would become Mike’s first wife. They seemed pretty suited. Marie was a bit of an oddball too (maybe we all were?) She was a little harsh with people around her at times, but then radio news can be a pressure job. Radio’s rolling news deadlines can be wearying. But she seemed a competent reporter, probably better than me. More steel-edged.
People at Radio NZ were generally happy for them and the couple seemed to keep to themselves. Mike dressed more and more like a bank manager with flash, old men’s suits and silk ties. Years later the couple would become ‘famous’ for trying to keep paparazzi from photographing their twins in public. Mike, it seemed, was a protective father and I admired at least that about him. Which makes his acid victim-bashing this week all the more galling for me.
Anyway, Mike moved into a co-host chair at Morning Report. He was mentored in that role by one of the most gracious news broadcasters it was ever my privilege to work with, Geoff Robinson, and a crash-hot team of radio producers, journalists and correspondents. It was a really good team and the show pumped. I moved to Parliament’s Press Gallery about then, back when it was the aristocracy of NZ journalism.
During his stint at Morning Report, people (including me) appreciated Mike’s somewhat bulldog approach to interviews, particularly political interviews. He wasn’t likeable, and he was a long way short of Kim Hill (in my view hands-down the best broadcaster in NZ, and I’ve observed a few) but the magazine format of Morning Report, and the excellent production team covered his weaknesses.
I lost track of him. I’d moved to Auckland and was producing The Paul Holmes Breakfast at NewstalkZB with Phil Yule and John Pagani and then Phil Armstrong. There, with a fraction of the resources of Morning Report, Paul’s small production team, with the ZB newsroom and correspondents (and the effervescent Bill Francis) banged out a radio news show of which I was, for the most part, pretty damn proud. With my friends, I drew a distinction between Paul’s radio show and his TV One ‘Holmes’ Show which seemed so lightweight at the time but some of which would now stand as quality journalism compared to the pap of Seven Sharp. The ads on the radio show drove me crazy, and there were moments where for one reason or another (‘Cheeky darky’) meh, not so proud. But Paul was a clown and a frustrated am-dram thespian. You needed to know that about him.
Sometimes the ‘role’ would inhabit Paul, like a budget version of Peter Sellers, and he would run away at the mouth. (I’d seen Paul in a play at Wellington Repertory Theatre or Bats or somewhere and remember laughing like a drain at his earnestness.) And Paul was a brilliant interviewer. My job as producer was to line up the interview subjects, write a background brief for Paul, an intro, and a question line. It is a measure of how good he was as an interviewer that he would listen to the answers and engage in the interview – not, like some of his fill-ins, just move to the next question on my list. There were times when Paul would excoriate someone he was interviewing. He could be merciless. But his life experience, his character, his family and friends in Hawkes Bay, these somehow grounded him. He was accountable to us. He was a good man.
As a broadcaster, as a human being, it seems to me that Paul Holmes had qualities that Mike Hosking seems to lack: notably self-awareness, empathy and compassion for people less fortunate than himself. These are damning shortcomings on Hosking’s part, in my opinion.
Eventually Paul retired and Mike Hosking was anointed breakfast show crown prince at NewstalkZB. Superficially, it was a job he’d prepared for, been grooming himself for. Congratulations. By coincidence, I was about 10 metres behind Hosking as we walked from our cars to Paul Holmes’ funeral at the cathedral in Parnell. Good to see him there.
Now it’s obvious, or should be, that people’s on-air ‘persona’ (just like their online persona) does not give an accurate account of the whole person. We are complex creatures, each of us, with internal drives and conflicting goals, passions and desires. But surely by now Mike Hosking is a professional broadcaster.
Hosking should be, by now, if not a master, at least in control of a ‘palate’ of radio announcer/public commentary tools and know the effect of each of them. Even an idiot with that much experience must have, by now, worked out how to use these oratorical tools – and worked out that his words and how he delivers them are weapons that can have an impact.
So Hosking’s awful, deeply nasty, socially-disconnected rant on TVOne’s Seven Sharp on Thursday night, where he attacked the victim of John Key’s serial harassment at her workplace as ‘selfish’ is intolerable. If it’s not apologised for, by Hosking or someone in authority over him, it is unforgivable. I support any moves to make Hosking accountable for his actions.*
For a man in such a position of privilege as Mike Hosking to perpetuate even more bullying on a young woman who was repeatedly harassed, over months, by a public figure – her personal space invaded by a man who ignored her requests and then demands that he STOP TOUCHING HER – is obscene.
It horrifies me to think that Mike Hosking now appears to have become a danger to women. How else are we to read his hateful message?
– P
* see ‘Hey RaboDirect, if Mike Hosking’s selling you, I’m not buying.‘
Very well said, Peter.
Any one who re victimizes a woman is a problem to be removed.
this attitude creates a rape culture and is not to be tolerated
Anyone who re victimizes ANYBODY.
Very illuminating.
All these years but no life experience. “I want be Caliph instead of the Caliph instead of the Caliph!”. Iznogoud.
Thanks for your comment. I did not know this:
Well said, Peter. Stop this sort of thing right now. It is indeed complely unacceptable and yes, creepy, for a figurehead of a nation, however laid back we are, to behave like this.
Mike Hosking is a “Shock Jock” and has always favoured his right.
Thanks for your comment. Personally, I think that understates his ability as a broadcaster, especially during his Morning Report days when his ‘lacks’ were made up for by an excellent team.
My horror and disappointment is at what he appears to have become. Is there no-one in his ear telling him to get a grip? – P
I get the feeling that the people in his ear are goading him on. TVNZ want their own Paul Henry. Outrage provides ratings, and ratings are king (or Caliph)…
Disappointing if you’re right Jono. And ‘they’ need to get the message that such hateful victim-bashing is not the path to ratings.
http://www.thepaepae.com/hey-rabodirect-if-mike-hoskings-selling-you-im-not-buying/35891/
Is anything going to be done about this? How is it possible that he can get away with victim blaming like he did in 2015? Please fight to get him removed from broadcasting this muck that puts us back in the dark ages. Its disgraceful.
Hes just another big mouth big ego tosser like paul henry.
Both need a good dressing down!!!
You hit the nail on the head Peter, hope Jono is not right, but what is going to be done
Hosking is an immoral apologist for Key’s government. I would like to know if the business owners he plugged so deeply, advertise on his shows?
Well, you could be forgiven for wondering what “relationship” Mike Hosking has with the cafe owners.
His “revolutionised the food scene” promotional hyperbole does beg the question. As does his apparent sympathy for the position they have found themselves in. – P
Journalism or PR – whatever, it was written about one of the Hip Group’s caffs in 2009:
http://www.richmondrdcafe.co.nz/dl/hipgroup.pdf
That’s interesting. Thanks – P
Hosking’s rants have turned me off seven sharp [some time ago]. His one minute rants are even worse.
But he is not alone a few talkback host take his line also. Sean Plunket did a character assassination on the victim late last week too. Then he cut a couple of women off who got just a little too close to his ‘testimonials”.
I feel he’s done more damage for his sponsors and the cafe owners then good, going by the response in the media – and all shows like his live and die by the amount of sponsor revenue they can attract, silly boy.
Remember John Tamihere’s comments about the roastbusters….he was stood down and replaced by Ali.
TVNZ, time to stand down the man you stand by….
Click bait for all media are more important than ethics. Sadly.
Unsuitable for the job. A broadcaster needs a heart and not to have strong sociopathic traits, too much influence is wielded. In my role as spokesperson for Candor Ive done prolly 200 or more tv/radio interviews. Only his one stood out to me as – well I can find no other word – SICK. We were discussing the high death rate from police chases. He said they all deserved death, never mind the innocent pedestrians, passengers or police killed by excessive pursuits. It’s not a full human. And aside from lacking empathy there is no intellectual equipment aboard, his analyses are shallow. He should not be foisted on us, there are surely higher grade ppl vying for the job. Ambition and drive alone should not be the ticket.
Apologies are just the kind of wishy washy liberal solution he’d mock, give him a dose of his own medicine. Tough love, the boot
Wow. Thanks for sharing your direct personal experience. -P
Wil the real Mike Hoskings please stand up …
http://www.hauraki.co.nz/listen/radio-hauraki-audio-vault/jeremy-wells-like-mike-hosking-rant-john-keys-ponytail-pulling/
If you remember Peter, Hosking first turned up doing an evening show networked to the regions but broadcast out of Wellington (I don’t think it aired in that market). He’d turn up in his suit at a time of night everyone else had loosened their ties, the latest Economist in his briefcase so he’d know what to think. His producer loathed him. Then he went off to Christchurch for a bit. When Sharon Crosbie came in as boss (fresh from running a core health services review for Bill Birch) one of her first actions was to bring him back to sit around for a couple of months waiting to be slotted into that Morning Report slot. A former RNZ manager told me that after a ninth floor bollocking over a particularly testy Kim Hill interview, Mike Wall had told him at the door that if he should heed “the Boss’s” demand to dump Hill, then Hosking would be a good replacement.
Hi Adam, nice to hear from you. Thanks for those details.
Yes, as I said, ‘Some of us have always seen …’
– P
Does anyone outside Auckland watch or listen to this arrogant tosser?
Certainly no-one in my nationwide network can be bothered with him, and to most of small town New Zealand, he is the epitome of jaffadom and has no credibility,no dignity,no authenticity,no style,just a pretentious superficiality-“full of sound and fury, signifying nothing………….
Having lived in Auckland for most of the last 30 years, I might be considered a Jafa. However, I am appalled that anybody might compare me with this arrogant right-wing specimen.
does the “Ninth floor” (PM’s office) regularly tell RNZ management what its editorial direction should be?
The question is not whether they try to tell management what its editorial direction is, it’s whether management acts on it. That manager told me he went back to the office and didn’t tell Hill anything about it – saw it as his job to soak up the crap from above, not to pass it on down the pipe. What his successors did is another question, but Hosking’s elevation so soon after Crosbie came in seemed indicative.
I’m just going to put this here: A brief note about comment moderation
Also, gee, if you’re going to castigate Mike Hosking (or me) please have the gumption not to use a rubbery e-mail address so that when I write to you in good faith, asking you to maybe tone it down and make your point without abuse, I don’t get this:
Thanks, P
I have a question I can’t answer. Perhaps someone here can help. It seems to me that there has been a 10 year strategy for the neocons to take over the media.
1 Hosking on ZB
2 Hosking on TVNZ
3 Funding Freeze at RNZ
4 Campbell Live on the ropes, (via Joyce > Julie Christie)
5 Neocon hacks zooming in to control issues, (Rachel Glucina)
6 Dirty Politics
Am I seeing conspiracy where there is none?
Steven
Thank you so much for writing this. Paul Holmes was able to connect with the common person. Now with John Campbell leaving, it would seem that we are left with people who lack compassion. You have restored my faith that perhaps there are still those within broadcasting that care.
Thanks for your comments.
I hope your prediction about Campbell is wildly premature. -P
This has to be stopped, maybe by a public outcry of condemnation. No-one who Is a boss (whether man or woman) has the right to misuse that position by abuse, sexual harrassment or physical attack.
They seem to think because they have power they can take “liberties” as they used to say. They do not understand the meaning of the word “NO.
Often they seem to be mild-mannered men, many known for a long time who, when left alone, turn into raging lunatics. Most definitely it should not be seen to be done by the PM of the country, and definitely not backed by the media, and remembered, which Is most important, at the Generał Election.
When I heard Hosking’s rant I thought straight away, that those words were for the pro-Key supporters. The essential message being that the waitress was complaining about trivia and that John Key was being wrongly attacked by a total nobody with a political agenda. The supporters seized on this line and Key enhanced it.
Dirty Tricks indeed!
Comparing Mike Hosking to Paul Holmes? To my eyes, they are virtually inseparable. Giant egos, self-obsessed and self-interested. No real journalistic skills to speak of, the team behind them made them who they are/were. You can throw Paul Henry in there too. The sad truth is that there is virtually no investigative journalism in NZ that is worthy of the name. All we have here is tabloid crap like Seven Sharp and Campbell Live. Sunday comes close, but that is pretty lightweight really. Now admittedly I spent many years in Europe and got used to the BBC, and the lowliest BBC current affairs programme is a thousand miles ahead of anything NZ has ever offered; but the reality is that journalism in this country serves one master, namely money, and the dumbing-down of broadcasting in New Zealand is nearly complete. People like Hosking could never exist in a BBC-like environment, they would be dismissed out of hand as unprofessional and inadequate.
As far as his comments on the waitress go, I didn’t see them (as I don’t bother watching either of the two laughingly-named “current affairs” shows in prime time), but I think there is more to this one than meets the eye, particularly given the way the news broke. Hosking may just be right about that…
“To my eyes, they are virtually inseparable.”
Hi Simon. Of course you’re entitled to that opinion. I see it (and them) differently, as I noted. – P
Mike Hoskings is not God,he should be stood down.
Hosking should look to the past to see his future.
And the past will let him see so many faces of failed TV and Radio hosts.
He will not always have a management team who tolerates his one eyed views on politics and other matters, and when a change of Government comes in the future I am sure that there will be those coming into power who have long memories as far as Hosking concerned.
His days in the sun may not be as long as he may think.
And good riddance.
I stopped listening to Morning Report because Hosking spoke too quickly;was shrill and rude; and, he was much softer asking questions of politicians than of public servants. Other times, I stopped listening were when it was fronted by the barely articulate (all the ‘ums’ and ‘ahhs’ irked) Sean Plunket. How or why he was employed is difficult to imagine. Radio New Zealand shines, due to its interviewers and presenters and reporters, whom are competent, neutral, persistent, incisive,comprehensive,careful, and intelligent. Unfortunately,Campbell is far from the high standard of a Maggie Barry, Kim Hill or Mary Wilson – to name only a few. Campbell’s ‘Checkpoint’ is pathetic by comparison with the past. It is soft journalism. It, also, suffers from his sympathy with his interviewees, as his sympathy doth ooze too much and,need not be shown, in order to present an accurate,descriptive,full and,fair, balanced report or – possessing the same qualities- credible interview.I am not talking about Campbell’s politics or values but his manner and choice of language. Bring back the old days, please.
DEVELOPMENT: DIARY-UP-DATE to self and Readers : I acknowledge and confess that I am regularly watching CHECKPOINT WITH JOHN CAMPBELL because “It’s There” – and it’s good.
A very strong first-person account from a former workmate of Mike Hosking was posted to a change.org petition* seeking to replace Hosking as TVNZ’s 7pm host – a platform it seems many people feel he has abused, as I do.
Bravo Liz.
[I’ll leave it out of blockquote style to assist legibility:]
*https://www.change.org/p/tvnz-get-rid-of-hosking-1347aa6d-8044-4a33-ba59-7fe0a5dba42b/c/468079907
I remember when I worked with him , he maintained as his mantra,
with his now usual level of inordinate pride, the intended-to-be
sardonic saying of Gordon Gecko in the original ” Wall St ” movie –
namely , that ” Greed Is Good” . He often repeated it off air, with
that faux air of Great Authority . We all thought he was joking at
first, but he was serious . I started to feel nauseous as I heard it
repeated on many days, and as I saw the results of such a
perspective in his approach to interviewees, and in his
manipulative media pronouncements -now foisted on viewers each
evening at peak time, and always aimed at endorsing Neo Liberal
ideology . He has maintained that dire stance throughout his
career, admiring those who exhibit the most greed and reviling
those who struggle under the weight and demands of the greedy
few . When I left TVNZ , I left with the most profound pity for such
a dessicated human , so bereft of empathy or compassion for his
fellow Kiwis , especially those who are facing difficulty or , God
forbid, failure . The year I did Breakfast with him , he went out of
his way to undermine me in every way he could find . My goal
became a very simple one…to get in early and sit quietly in that
darkened studio and say a quiet resolution – a whispered prayer –
asking for help so that I would never react and never never sink to
his level. That I would maintain my own dignity and never let the
hurts show in any overt reaction to his many attempts to humiliate
and belittle . It was a year of teeth-gritting , white knuckle survival .
A quiet triumph . Every day. Over the passive and overt bullying . I
have never spoken of it in public until now , when it is relevant
here, to the issue of the sort of man whom TVNZ have placed in
such a position of influence. I used to wonder if he would ever find
that point where his lust for money or power could be satiated ? If
he would ever find authentic , not trumped -up happiness, on that
heavy path of the pursuit of “still-more money “? And I wondered
too what had shaped a man so lacking in human kindness ? I hope
he can one day turn this around. He always wanted to be Paul
Holmes but he never could emulate the real Paul . In spite of Paul’s
self -admitted human fallibilities, Paul genuinely cared for people
when he saw them suffering . He had a huge heart for Kiwis . Paul
himself knew suffering. I wonder if Mike has ever allowed himself
to feel that vulnerability? Do those who won’t open to their own
pain , risk becoming in-suffer-able.? I do not think he is a healthy
touchstone for NZ broadcasting . I hope with time and perhaps
some of the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, himself, he
can find a more real place , a more human face , a more caring
heart for his fellow Kiwis . Until then, I wish for a far more
empathetic nightly host to take his place at 7 pm . I endorse this
petition.
Liz Gunn.
OMG, What a wonderfully revealing string. I found Hosking, Henry and Holmes, were all insufferable, but apparently Holmes must have had some genuine humanity.
Regarding the ‘ninth floor’ autocracy, this was never more clear to me than the hushed-up, self-immolation, on the lawn in front of parliament , two days before the election, Sept 2017.
It was very sobering to hear on the 6am news next day, that he/she had died. But, what was far worse, in some respects, was the fact that the story was immediately pulled, early that morning.
Meanwhile an inconsequential story about One of the voting pre-registration booths running out of papers, continued through the whole day.
I tried to submit a ‘formal complaint’ to RNZ , but was fobbed off.
So many people I speak to seem to have zero awareness of this incident.
I would still like to raise awareness, as it seems to show RNZ, very clearly vulnerable to political pressure.
Thanks for the excellent blog. paulmac